Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Laxmi Dass v. P P Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim order directing rent from disputed estate properties to be collected and deposited in a court-monitored account, dismissing the appellant's challenge without deciding ownership merits.
Dr Shelly Bhutani v. Maharaja Agrasain Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to reduction in rank of school employees fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Delhi School Tribunal under Section 8(3) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973, and dismissed the writ petition accordingly.
Rajiv Chaturvedi v. PEC Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file additional documents in ongoing departmental enquiry, emphasizing the right to lead evidence and directing timely completion of proceedings.
M/S. RAMA SERVICE STATION v. GURDAYAL SINGH VERMA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals arising from a motor accident claim by recording an out-of-court settlement between the vehicle owner and insurance company, thereby varying recovery rights.
M/S. RAMA SERVICE STATION v. GURDAYAL SINGH VERMA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals arising from a motor accident claim by recording an out-of-court settlement that varied the tribunal award and denied recovery rights to the insurer against the vehicle owner.
Rohan Gupta v. State Bank of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief directing issuance of call letter under the PwD category to a candidate with specific learning disability for a recruitment examination, recognizing dyslexia as a disability category despite pending identification of suitable posts.
D L Pahuja v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner's claim for third MACP benefit and mandated communication of reasons if denied, ensuring administrative transparency.
Sanjay Ambavat & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed filing and consideration of objections to a tentative seniority list before finalization and promotions, refusing to quash the list without objections.
Anita v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent authority to consider the petitioner’s Representation within eight weeks and communicate the decision, ensuring procedural fairness in administrative grievance redressal.
Promila Devi v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioners' fresh representation by a speaking order within a specified timeframe, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Maria Jamal v. Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file a representation challenging her non-selection, which the university must consider and respond to with a reasoned order, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Jimmeesh James and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted petitioners parity with a similar case, permitting them to file individual applications for transfer of contracts from AIATSL to Air India within two weeks, directing expeditious disposal.
Dharam Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking re-employment and back wages beyond the prescribed age limit, holding that entitlement depends on scheme approval and actual service rendered.
Gulzar Md. & Ors. v. Braille Library & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to consider the petitioners' Representation regarding grievances and the transfer order, providing timely responses, without adjudicating on the transfer's validity.
Forech India Ltd. v. The Designated Authority
The Delhi High Court held that extension of Anti-Dumping Duty pending Sunset Review is not automatic and requires a valid notification before expiry of the original levy, invalidating retrospective and post-expiry extensions without continuity.
FORECH INDIA LTD. v. THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective extension of Anti-Dumping Duty after expiry is invalid, requiring strict adherence to statutory timelines and valid notifications for continuation or extension of such duties.
FORECH INDIA LTD. v. THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective extension of Anti-Dumping Duty after expiry without continuity is invalid, requiring strict adherence to statutory timelines and notifications under Section 9A(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Mishri Devi and Anr. v. New Delhi Municipal Council and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining the NDMC from transferring a shop forcibly taken from the petitioners, pending appeal, subject to conditions on adjournments.
Rahul Mehra v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of W.P. (C) 1489/2013 by referring to an earlier order in W.P. (C) No. 195/2010, requiring no further orders.
Larken Holdings Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition for voluntary winding up of Larken Holdings Private Limited after satisfaction of all statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.