Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Order: May 31, 2018
SMT. ANITA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Archana Sharma and Mr. Divakar Upadhyay, Advocates
Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 and 3.
JUDGMENT
1. To seek the relief as sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-2) was made by petitioner on 11th April, 2018 to respondents. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is no response to the Representation (Annexure P-2).
2. Despite service of advance notice, there is no Representation on behalf of respondent-School.
3. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to second respondent to effectively consider petitioner’s Representation (Annexure P-2) within a period of eight weeks and the fate of the Representation be made known to petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available, if need be. 2018:DHC:3645 W.P.(C) 6180/2018
4. Respondent-School be apprised of this order forthwith, to ensure its compliance.
5. With the aforesaid directions, this petition is disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to petitioner’s counsel.
JUDGE MAY 31, 2018 p