Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Subrahmanium v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction of the appellant for abducting a minor child under Sections 363 and 364A IPC based on credible child testimony and circumstantial evidence.
Krishna Devi v. Kartar Singh Bidhuri
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Second Appeal against decrees for specific performance, holding that no substantial question of law arose and that appreciation of evidence by lower courts cannot be re-examined in a Second Appeal.
PUNJ LLOYD LTD v. THE COMMISSIONER VALUE ADDED TAX
The Delhi High Court held that once the limitation period under Section 34 of the DVAT Act expires and no fresh assessment order is passed after remand, the petitioner’s refund claim crystallizes and must be granted, quashing the department’s order rejecting the refund.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff's Indian Patent No. 184753 is a valid standard essential patent and that the defendants infringed it by manufacturing and selling DVD players without license, entitling the plaintiff to relief.
M/S. MOTHERSON SUMI ELECTRIC WIRES v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that a Domestic Tariff Area supplier who paid excise duty via CENVAT credit on goods supplied to a 100% EOU is entitled to refund of Terminal Excise Duty for the period prior to the 2013 amendment introducing ab initio exemption.
Inspector Ajay Sharma v. State of Not of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging the deduction of Rs. 1,000 cost from the petitioner's salary for delay in filing a medical report, setting aside the deduction and directing a refund.
Sonu v. Premlata
The petitioner withdrew the petition, and the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn, disposing of the connected application.
TATA SONS LIMITED v. MR.JAYARAM AYAA
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Tata Sons Limited, restraining the defendant from using the 'TATA' trademark and awarding damages and costs for trademark infringement.
State Bank of India v. Dharambir Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions filed by State Bank of India, holding that where an alternative appellate remedy exists, writ petitions are not maintainable.
Batesh & Ors v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Town Vending Committee to consider street vendors' applications on merits without rejecting them solely for non-vending at survey time, disposing of writ petitions with procedural directions.
Surender Dahiya v. Sumit
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under IPC and Arms Act on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Keshav Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in serious offences including robbery and kidnapping at the prosecution evidence stage, emphasizing the gravity of the crime and active participation of the petitioners.
Through Mr. Ashwini Kumar Mata, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocate v. ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED (ARCIL)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Appellate Tribunal's orders, holding that the respondent was a secured creditor entitled to invoke the SARFAESI Act and that the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory pre-deposit conditions.
NTPC Limited v. G.L. Sharma & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside its earlier order directing NTPC to reconsider a VRS rejection without notice, emphasizing the necessity of fair hearing and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Birender Sangwan v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition alleging unauthorized constructions for lack of bona fide intent and vague, selective allegations unsupported by specific facts.
Salek Chand Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents and Municipal Corporations to treat a writ petition concerning children's rights and audit findings as a representation and take remedial action within four months.
Rajesh Wadhwa v. Rajesh Gulla
The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. holding that once revision is dismissed, the extraordinary jurisdiction cannot be invoked to seek a second revisional scrutiny in a cheque bounce case under Section 138 NI Act.
Rajesh Wadhwa v. Rajesh Gulla
The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner cannot invoke Section 482 Cr.P.C. to challenge an order already dismissed in revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C. without special circumstances, and dismissed the petitions seeking quashing of trial under Section 138 NI Act.
Uddam Singh Jain Charitable Trust & Ors. v. Atma Ram Builders Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld a summary suit decree under Order XXXVII CPC enforcing lease liabilities, dismissing appellants' defence and rejecting applicability of Section 25 Indian Trust Act to a public charitable trust.
Uddam Singh Jain Charitable Trust & Ors. v. Atma Ram Builders Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging a summary suit decree under Order XXXVII CPC enforcing lease liability for unauthorized construction charges paid by the plaintiff to a government authority.