Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 5402/2017
>. ... Petitioner SURENDER KUMAR .
Through Ms. Raj Kumari, Adv.
CRL.M.C. 5402/2017
>. ... Petitioner SURENDER KUMAR .
Through Ms. Raj Kumari, Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE (GOVT, OF NCT OF DELHI) &ANR THESTAlbCW^^^^^^ Ms. Manjeet Arya,. APP with SI
Sumit,P.S.UttamNagar Mr. Satish K. Sansi, Adv. with respondent no. 2inperson
Sumit,P.S.UttamNagar Mr. Satish K. Sansi, Adv. with respondent no. 2inperson
AND
CRL.M.C. 5423/2017 and Crl. M.A. nos. 21174-75/2017
Petitioner SURENDER DAHIYA
Through Mr. SatishK. Sansi, Adv. I
Petitioner SURENDER DAHIYA
Through Mr. SatishK. Sansi, Adv. I
VERSUS
Sumit,P.S.UttamNagar Ms. Raj Kumari, Adv. with respondent no. 2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
0/„ 11.07.2018
By these petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioners/oomplainants/aoousedl^aveprayedfor quasiring oftire following
2018:DHC:8363 r cross FIRs;- a) FIR No. 878/2014 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPC registered at
Police Station Uttam Nagar on the complaint of Surender Dahiya
(respondent no. 2/complainant) in Crl. M.C. No. 5402/2017 and petitioner/accused in Crl. M.C. no. 5423/2017. b) FIRNo. 877/2014 under Section 307 IPC and Sections 30/27/54/59 ofthe Arms Act registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar on the complaint of Surender Kumar (respondent no. 2/complainant) in Crl. M.C. NO. 5423/2017 and petitioner/accused in Crl. M.C. no. 5402/2017.
Complainants/accused/petitioners in both the aforesaid FIRs are present in Court and have been identified by SI Sumit of Police Station
Uttam Nagar. They submit that they have settled the matter amicably of their ownfree will and without any undue force, pressureorcoercion. They submitthat they do notwant to pursue their respective FIRs any further and the same may be quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties, mmy view, no fruitful purpose wouldbe served to keep the criminal proceedings
.pending. Accordingly, in the interest ofjustice both the FIRs, that is, FIR
No. 87872014 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 877/2014
„,«„d . «i- s— »—— -«- emanatingtherefrom are quashed, , ' :Boththepetitions aredisposedofintheaboveterms. Miscaianeous
0/„ 11.07.2018
By these petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioners/oomplainants/aoousedl^aveprayedfor quasiring oftire following
2018:DHC:8363 r cross FIRs;- a) FIR No. 878/2014 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPC registered at
Police Station Uttam Nagar on the complaint of Surender Dahiya
(respondent no. 2/complainant) in Crl. M.C. No. 5402/2017 and petitioner/accused in Crl. M.C. no. 5423/2017. b) FIRNo. 877/2014 under Section 307 IPC and Sections 30/27/54/59 ofthe Arms Act registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar on the complaint of Surender Kumar (respondent no. 2/complainant) in Crl. M.C. NO. 5423/2017 and petitioner/accused in Crl. M.C. no. 5402/2017.
Complainants/accused/petitioners in both the aforesaid FIRs are present in Court and have been identified by SI Sumit of Police Station
Uttam Nagar. They submit that they have settled the matter amicably of their ownfree will and without any undue force, pressureorcoercion. They submitthat they do notwant to pursue their respective FIRs any further and the same may be quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties, mmy view, no fruitful purpose wouldbe served to keep the criminal proceedings
.pending. Accordingly, in the interest ofjustice both the FIRs, that is, FIR
No. 87872014 under Sections 452/323/506/34 IPC and FIR No. 877/2014
„,«„d . «i- s— »—— -«- emanatingtherefrom are quashed, , ' :Boththepetitions aredisposedofintheaboveterms. Miscaianeous
ORDER
5. Dasti. applications aredisposedofas infructuous. JtJLVll,2W[8] r.bararia A.K. P AK? J'