Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Five Star Constructions Pvt. Ltd. v. Orchid Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted a two-month extension to conclude arbitral proceedings under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on a joint petition citing voluminous records and ongoing arguments.
Ranjeet Singh v. Nanki Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the invalidity of mutation entries conferring exclusive ownership without proper legal proof, declaring the sale of ancestral property illegal and affirming the rightful heirs' title and possession.
Sunita Trehan & Anr. v. Visharat & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' application to release compensation fixed deposits in stages for reconstruction despite absence of sanctioned building plans due to unauthorized colony status.
National Insurance Co Ltd. v. Alka Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the compensation awarded to the injured for permanent disability and loss of income in a motor accident claim.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Chaman Goyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding the insurance policy genuine and upholding the compensation awarded to the injured motorcyclist in a vehicular accident.
Cholamandalam MS General Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Ram Kishan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified the motor accident compensation award by reassessing functional disability, reducing future prospects addition to 40%, and directing future medical expenses to be paid directly to the hospital.
Finest Promoters Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the withdrawal of approval under the Industrial Park Scheme and Section 80IA, holding that the petitioner was not given a fair hearing and that delay within the grace period and reduction in constructed area without statutory minimum do not justify withdrawal.
Satish Kumar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction for conspiracy and robbery but upheld his conviction for possession of stolen property under Section 411 IPC based on recovery and identification of stolen goods.
Pawan Mehta v. Sunil Malik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court restored a complaint dismissed for non-prosecution due to bona fide non-appearance, allowing the petitioner to lead pre-charge evidence upon payment of costs.
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the employer responsible for delay in contract completion where extension of time was granted without liquidated damages, affirming that courts will not interfere with factual findings of arbitrators absent perversity.
M/S Simplex Infrastructures Ltd v. Chandan Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of a penalty on the principal employer under the Employees Compensation Act for failure to provide timely assistance to an injured subcontractor employee.
Rajesh Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for murder based on reliable dying declarations and corroborative evidence despite the victim's severe burn injuries and procedural challenges in recording the statements.
DDA v. Bansal Traders
The Delhi High Court dismissed DDA's petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1996, rejecting condonation of delay due to inadequate notice and non-bonafide pendency of a prior petition under the Arbitration Act, 1940.
Surinder Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court modified murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder where the accused did not share the intention to kill and the killing occurred in the heat of passion.
Suraj Bhan & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from a neighborly quarrel after the parties amicably settled their dispute, emphasizing the court's discretion to end futile criminal proceedings to restore peace.
Suraj Bhan & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a neighborly quarrel after the parties amicably settled their dispute and undertook to maintain peace.
Rahul & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes and obtained a mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
Manish & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Mohd. Arif v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC read with the Dowry Prohibition Act based on a bona fide settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing restoration of peace and ends of justice.
Haresh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a theft case after credible CCTV evidence showed he was not present at the crime scene.