Full Text
Translation output
$-48 to 50 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 7085/2018 & CM No.26930/2018
STATE BANK OF INDIA ^ Petitioner " Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate
W.P.(C) 7085/2018 & CM No.26930/2018
STATE BANK OF INDIA ^ Petitioner " Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate
VERSUS
SAGDEV SHARMA AND ORS.
Through WITH.Respondents
Through WITH.Respondents
W.P.(C) 7086/2018 & CM No.26931/2018
STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate
STATE BANK OF INDIA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate
VERSUS
DHARAMBIR SINGH & ANR
Through
Through
WITH
Respondents
W.P.(C) 7090/2018 & CM No.26933/2018
STATE BANK OF INDIA Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate
STATE BANK OF INDIA Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate
VERSUS
SATYADEV SHARMA & ORS
Through Respondents
Through Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR 2018:DHC:8544-DB.Jr
. 11.07.2018 While arguing the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner accepts thatthe impugned order is appealable.
In view of the said position, we are not inclinedto entertain the present writpetitions and give liberty to thepetitioner to take recourse to appellate remedy.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are not entertained, without expressing any opinion on merits. The petitions are disposed of All thepending applications arealso disposed of. c
SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDWSHEKHAR, J JULY 11, 2018 tP, 2018:DHC:8544-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR 2018:DHC:8544-DB.Jr
. 11.07.2018 While arguing the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner accepts thatthe impugned order is appealable.
In view of the said position, we are not inclinedto entertain the present writpetitions and give liberty to thepetitioner to take recourse to appellate remedy.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are not entertained, without expressing any opinion on merits. The petitions are disposed of All thepending applications arealso disposed of. c
SANJIV KHANNA, J CHANDWSHEKHAR, J JULY 11, 2018 tP, 2018:DHC:8544-DB
JUDGMENT