Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Pushpendra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the Tribunal and suggested expeditious disposal of the matter.
Gian Singh v. Sh Suresh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that interim orders are not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC and dismissed the petition challenging an order directing temporary utility connections.
Mohd. Abbas v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court refused to direct the Central Administrative Tribunal to expedite hearing of petitioners' cases, holding that such matters are to be decided by the Tribunal itself without judicial interference.
Saurabh Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to hear and decide the petitioner's complaint under Section 246 of the Companies Act, 2013 by passing a reasoned speaking order after affording a fair opportunity of hearing.
Puneet Singh v. Nupur Pal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against contempt conviction for wilful disobedience of a settlement order, upheld the Supreme Court's dismissal of the related SLP, and took serious note of the litigant's non-disclosure of the Supreme Court order.
PL Vasudeva v. ML Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as abated and for non-prosecution due to the appellant’s failure to bring legal heirs on record and inordinate delay in substitution application without sufficient cause.
Rama Motor Services Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act against an ex-parte order, deferring the validity of the impugned notification to the Supreme Court’s pending decision.
RAMA MOTOR SERVICES PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to grant proper hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court decision.
Santosh Kumar Pandey v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders due to improper communication of Show Cause Notices and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard, leaving the validity of the underlying notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
MS Phoolchand Harikishan v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Rama Motor Services Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of State Goods and Service Tax Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford a proper hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration while leaving the validity of the impugned notification open pending Supreme Court decision.
Hind Paper House v. The Commissioner State Goods and Service Tax Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper hearing due to initial non-uploading of documents, directing a fresh hearing after valid service of the Show Cause Notice.
Kailashpati Polyplast Pvt Ltd v. Raghav Industries
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the trial court's refusal to admit a late-filed Section 65B certificate under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that procedural discretion must be exercised judiciously and not to fill lacunae after final arguments.
M/S P V PRODUCTS & ORS. v. M/S TEJ RAM DHARAM PAUL & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex parte interim injunction in a trademark infringement suit, holding that no interference is warranted before the final hearing absent exceptional circumstances.
Lakum Jignesh Kumar v. DG CISF
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s transfer application in accordance with the new 2024 transfer policy and communicate the decision promptly, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Abdul Aleem v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that both serving and retired Group 'A' officers are eligible for appointment as Special Metropolitan Magistrates under Section 18(1) CrPC and the 1998 Rules, dismissing the petition challenging appointments of serving officers.
Union of India and Ors. v. Hav Kedar Kirankumar Udhav (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for seizure disorder, affirming the presumption of service-attributable disability and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law.
Ravinder v. The Director General Central Industrial Security Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Board’s decision declaring the petitioner unfit for paramilitary recruitment, holding that the decision was supported by proper medical evidence and complied with applicable guidelines.
Exclusive Capital Limited v. Clover Media Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that exemption from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act requires bona fide, substantiated urgency, and mere assertion of urgent interim relief is insufficient to maintain a commercial suit without mediation.
PEC Ltd. v. M/s Badri Singh Vinimay Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing refund for damaged lentils sold under an "as is where is" tender, holding that the clause was diluted by parties' conduct and the buyer was entitled to relief.