Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Waraich, Kritarth Upadhyay, Vivek Sharma, Khushi and Saksham Sharma v. Gaurav Rana

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6556-DB

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in medical fitness findings by recruitment medical boards is limited and set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, upholding the concurrent findings of unfitness.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical fitness recruitment police recruitment medical examination board

Nimit Builders Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

05 Aug 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:6491-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and orders issued post 01.04.2021 for assessment year 2015-16 as barred by limitation under the amended Income Tax Act and TOLA, following Supreme Court precedent.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 149

M/S ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI

05 Aug 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:6484-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order passed without issuing a mandatory show-cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh proceedings with an opportunity of hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143(3) Section 144B show-cause notice

M/S. TRANS INDIA LOGISTICS v. GSTO, WARD-60 & ANR.

05 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6689-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST demand order due to denial of hearing and procedural lapses, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court's decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Kamini Malhotra v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Aug 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:6660-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act do not lapse where possession is deemed taken by the Supreme Court, directing compensation payment upon compliance with procedural requirements.

property petition_partly_allowed Significant land acquisition possession deemed possession Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT LTD v. MUNMUN GHOSH PROPRIETOR M S 66 IN GUEST HOUSE & ANR

05 Aug 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:6702
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator prima facie arbitration agreement scope of judicial scrutiny

LT Governor of Delhi v. Dr Davindera Kumar

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6454-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the reversion of an employee's promotion for concealment of a criminal case, holding that natural justice requires a proper show-cause notice before such adverse action.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant principles of natural justice reversion after promotion show-cause notice vigilance clearance

Gaurav Singh Sengan v. Bhanwar Lal

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6514-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, holding that medical expert reports can only be interfered with on limited grounds which were absent in this case.

administrative appeal_allowed medical examination hypertension Central Administrative Tribunal medical board

Gaurav Singh Sengan v. KM Madhu

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6515-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Tribunal erred in directing a fresh medical examination without valid grounds, upholding the consistent medical reports declaring the respondent medically unfit.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical examination cubitus valgus carrying angle Central Administrative Tribunal

Gaurav Singh Sengan v. Ajeet Kumar Yadav

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6512-DB

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, holding that consistent medical reports declaring the respondent unfit due to hypertension cannot be interfered with absent valid grounds.

administrative appeal_allowed medical examination hypertension Central Administrative Tribunal interference with medical opinion

B.K. Singh v. UOI & Ors.

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6472-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of dereliction of duty against a customs appraiser for failing to verify the nature of detained goods and insisted on mandatory clearances, dismissing the writ petition challenging the administrative tribunal's order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant dereliction of duty customs appraiser No Objection Certificate wildlife department

Ms. Minakshi Singh v. Amrish Kumar

05 Aug 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:6498-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a fresh medical examination by a specialist to determine the respondent's fitness for appointment, emphasizing procedural fairness and finality in recruitment medical assessments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical fitness recruitment Staff Selection Commission Central Administrative Tribunal

Sharpline Broadcast Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 58 Zone 4

05 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6560-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders and directed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal, deferring the validity of impugned GST notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_dismissed Procedural GST notifications Section 168A CGST Act Show Cause Notice Appeal under Section 107 CGST Act

Sharpline Broadcast Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 58 Zone 4

05 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:6558-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders passed without proper notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while leaving the validity of deadline-extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice natural justice GST portal Section 168A CGST Act

Uma Lata Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Aug 2025 · Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:6431
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that cash loans violating Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act do not invalidate legally enforceable debts under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and allowed the appeal against acquittal for cheque dishonour.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 269SS Income Tax Act legally enforceable debt cash loan

Tafseer Ahmad v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

05 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:6647

The Delhi High Court directed joint inspection and scientific demarcation of disputed land to protect possession rights, allowing the petitioner’s presence and deferring demolition until demarcation completion.

property petition_allowed demarcation possession land acquisition Total Station Method

Satish Sharma & Anr. v. State & Anr.

05 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:6573

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges under Sections 506(1), 509, 341, and 34 IPC, ruling that inconclusive CCTV footage does not negate prima facie allegations supported by witness statements at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge Section 506 IPC Section 509 IPC Section 341 IPC

Rajinder Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

05 Aug 2025 · Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:6587

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the land acquisition compensation enhancement claim for fresh adjudication, permitting reliance on a lead case's evidence while denying interest for delay caused by the claimant's inaction.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation enhancement lead case interest entitlement

Sgt Manish Kumar Singh and Sgt Mritunjay v. Ex Sgt Babu Lal Yadav

05 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6507-DB
Cites 9 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petitions challenging disability pensions granted by the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming that disabilities not attributable to service do not qualify for pension, in line with Supreme Court precedents.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal attributable to service lifestyle disease

Asha Ram & Ors. v. Union of India through Ministry of Law and Justice & Ors.

05 Aug 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:6522-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after respondents complied with the Court's order on amendments to Permanent Lok Adalat Rules, allowing withdrawal with liberty to pursue other remedies.

administrative petition_dismissed Permanent Lok Adalat Rules 2003 amendment sitting fee conveyance allowance