Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Yashwani Verma v. Virender Verma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of the wife's claim for interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that she had sufficient income and support, while the husband was financially incapacitated.
M. A. Zahid v. Jindal Saw Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting principal and dual-rate post-award interest, holding the arbitrator's discretion on interest rates is broad and not subject to interference absent manifest unreasonableness.
Garuda Construction and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Dinesh Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to call a Delhi Police official as witness but allowed the defendant liberty to cross-examine the police witness already examined by the plaintiff, imposing costs for delay.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex MWO Retd Ram Naval Verma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law apparent on record.
Ananta Joshi v. Mohini Lau & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the pending contempt application expeditiously, despite a pending appeal against the injunction order.
M/S TULLIO GIUSI SRL v. GLOSSY BUTTONS PVT. LTD
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the quantum of costs imposed by the Trial Court for delay, directing the petitioner to first seek waiver or reduction before the Trial Court.
Kinri Dhir v. Sudhir Mittal LR
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking stay of execution proceedings as premature in the absence of any adverse order against the judgment debtor.
Union of India & Ors. v. Krishan Kumar Sharma
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force member suffering from Pituitary Macroadenoma, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless proven otherwise by the employer.
Union of India & Ors. v. Kunwar Veer Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.
Tanish Enterprises v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to allow further cross-examination of a witness already examined and discharged, holding that vague requests without compelling reasons do not warrant interference under Article 227.
Ms. Minakshi Singh and Mr. Ashutosh Bharti v. Ex NB Sub Joga Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related unless disproved by the employer, and limited its interference under certiorari jurisdiction.
Aryan @ Maxi v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted Aryan for lack of conclusive identification but upheld Vicky's conviction for armed robbery under Sections 392, 394, and 397 IPC, affirming that use of a deadly weapon during robbery attracts Section 397 IPC.
Manoj Garg v. Samay Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against rejection of an application to reject plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that limitation and disputed factual issues require trial and cannot be decided at the threshold.
M/S NRS CATERING UNIT v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted a 7-month extension of a catering stall license at HAPA Railway Station considering Covid-19 closure as dies non, affirming its jurisdiction and requiring an undertaking to vacate post-extension.
Bhupender Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a large-scale financial fraud case due to prolonged pre-trial detention, lack of direct evidence, and parity with co-accused already on bail.
Harpreet Kaur v. Rajinder Pal Singh Grover
The High Court allowed a belated opportunity to a subsequent purchaser to lead evidence on title documents already on record, imposing costs for delay, to ensure fair trial in a property ownership dispute.
L and T Finance Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order directing FIR registration under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., holding that prima facie cognizable offences were disclosed and criminal investigation was warranted despite the dispute's civil aspects.
M/S ACCE GLOBAL SOFTWARE PVT LTD v. M/S AVANT CAREER PVT LTD
Summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC is barred in suits originally filed under summary procedure (Order XXXVII CPC), even if subsequently converted into ordinary suits.
Mohd. Imran v. The State GNCTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against Mohd. Imran for deaths caused by a fire due to negligent building safety violations, dismissing his discharge plea at the charge framing stage.
Kapil Wadhawan v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court dismissed Kapil Wadhawan's bail application in a massive financial fraud case, emphasizing the gravity of economic offences and the risk of tampering with evidence.