Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

ICICI Bank Limited v. Mamraj Tomar

06 Aug 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:4888
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's appeal to appoint an ex parte receiver to repossess a hypothecated vehicle upon the borrower's default in EMI payments, emphasizing lawful recovery procedures.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte receiver hypothecation loan default vehicle repossession

ICICI Bank Limited v. Satya Prakash Chaudhary

06 Aug 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:4889
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed an ex parte receiver to take possession of a hypothecated vehicle due to the borrower's default and risk of disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte receiver hypothecation loan default vehicle recovery

ICICI Bank Limited v. Rahul & Anr.

06 Aug 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:4890
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the bank's appeal and appointed an ex parte receiver to take possession of a hypothecated vehicle due to the borrower's default in loan repayment and risk of disposal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte receiver hypothecation loan default vehicle repossession

ICICI Bank Limited v. Akash Parashar

06 Aug 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:4884
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed ICICI Bank's appeal and appointed a receiver to take possession of a hypothecated vehicle due to the borrower's default and risk of disposal, emphasizing lawful recovery procedures.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte receiver hypothecation loan default vehicle repossession

Ratna Infrastructure Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Meja Urja Nigam Private Limited

06 Aug 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:4875

The Delhi High Court held that under the amended Arbitration Act, the court’s role in appointing an arbitrator is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement’s existence and appointed a sole arbitrator despite overlapping claims and objections of res judicata and limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 11(6-A) arbitration agreement

Mukesh Sharma v. M/S Faces Cosmetics (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

06 Aug 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4878

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that without a proved agreement, there is no automatic right to have unsold stocks taken back by the supplier or manufacturer.

civil appeal_dismissed dealer agreement unsold stocks return of goods trade practice

M/S. Aithent Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Archana Verma

06 Aug 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4879

The Delhi High Court allowed the employer's appeal, holding that absent any agreement to defer salary payments, a claim for unpaid deferred salary arising from salary restructuring due to financial difficulties is not maintainable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant deferred salary salary restructuring private employment contract acceptance by conduct

Union of India v. Manjit Singh Bali

06 Aug 2018 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2018:DHC:4876
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld CIC orders directing disclosure of prosecution sanction documents under the RTI Act, rejecting claims of exemption under Sections 8(1)(h) and 24(1) and improper procedural defenses by the Union of India.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(h) Section 24(1) Central Information Commission

Union of India v. Manjit Singh Bali

06 Aug 2018 · Vibhu Bahkru · 2018:DHC:4877
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld CIC orders directing disclosure of prosecution sanction documents under the RTI Act, holding that such information is not exempt or excluded post-investigation without specific grounds of impediment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(h) Section 24(1) Section 6

Shadab Husain Khan v. Lieutenant Governor of NCT Delhi and Ors.

06 Aug 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:9126-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment notifications for senior posts in the Department of Law, holding no grounds for interference.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition appointment Principal Secretary Additional Secretary

Tyagi Public School v. Hem Lata Tyagi; Mahesh Rani; Sudha Sabharwal; Veena Sharma; Meena Gupta; Urmila Singh

06 Aug 2018 · Pratibha Rani · 2018:DHC:9124

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging a gratuity payment order as withdrawn, granting liberty to seek extension of time due to financial constraints.

labor appeal_dismissed Payment of Gratuity Act writ petition Article 226 Article 227

Rahul Kumar v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr

06 Aug 2018 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mr. Justice Charishankar · 2018:DHC:9122-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's repeated failure to appear in court.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition non-prosecution dismissal in default petitioner's absence

Amit Kumar v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

06 Aug 2018 · The Acting Chief Justice; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:9059-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition in default due to the petitioner's failure to appear and non-payment of process fee, indicating non-prosecution.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition non-prosecution dismissal in default process fee

Alok Mahajan v. D P Mahajan & Ors.

06 Aug 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:8784-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed two civil appeals as withdrawn following an unconditional withdrawal application based on an amicable settlement between the parties.

civil appeal_dismissed appeal withdrawal amicable settlement exemption application dismissal of appeal

Amit Bansal v. State (NCT of Delhi)

06 Aug 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8192

The Delhi High Court extended interim protection against arrest to petitioners until the Magistrate decides on their regular bail applications in a criminal case involving offences under IPC Sections 328, 342, 354C, and 34.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail interim protection regular bail Section 173 CrPC

Mr. Zahid Hanief, Adv. for Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, Adv. for GNCTD. v. PREMA .....

06 Aug 2018 · HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA; To be referred to the R... · 2018:DHC:4873

The Delhi High Court held that failure of sterilization operation without specific negligence and with informed consent does not amount to medical negligence, allowing the hospital's appeal and dismissing the plaintiff's suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence sterilization operation tubectomy informed consent

M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S PCL-STICO (JV)

06 Aug 2018 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; C. HARI SHANKAR · 2018:DHC:4867-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting additional compensation to a contractor for increased earthwork due to design changes and delayed site handover, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Clause 52.[1] GCC Clause 52.[2] GCC Variations in contract

Vinod Kumar & Anil Kumar v. NCT of Delhi

06 Aug 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:4865-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder benefit of doubt confession

Anup Prakash Garg v. Enforcement Directorate

06 Aug 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:4864

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a PMLA case involving alleged money laundering linked to bank credit facilities, emphasizing the requirement of joint trial with the scheduled offence and considering the stage of investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act bail scheduled offence Prevention of Corruption Act

Amit Kumar v. Bharati College

06 Aug 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:4910-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the inquiry process into sexual harassment complaints, clarifying that limitation and other legal objections can be raised before the disciplinary or appellate authority, and upheld the delegation of inquiry functions to a subcommittee under the Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 Section 9 limitation Section 10 conciliation Internal Complaints Committee