Delhi High Court
29,726 judgments
ABL Workspaces Private Limited v. Vinod Kundra and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Arbitrator’s interim order directing the tenant to furnish a fixed deposit, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act and the tenant’s precarious financial position.
Shri Pradeep and Anr v. Smt Savitri Sidana and Ors
The High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on limitation grounds, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.
Pragati Power Corporation Ltd v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court must appoint an arbitrator upon prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, regardless of denial of liability, leaving arbitrability and merits to the arbitral tribunal.
OM HYDRO POWER LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of Central Financial Assistance due to inordinate delay and held that a later administrative order did not provide a fresh cause of action.
Waraich, Kritarth Upadhyay, Vivek Sharma, Khushi and Saksham Sharma v. Gaurav Rana
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in medical fitness findings by recruitment medical boards is limited and set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, upholding the concurrent findings of unfitness.
Nimit Builders Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices and orders issued post 01.04.2021 for assessment year 2015-16 as barred by limitation under the amended Income Tax Act and TOLA, following Supreme Court precedent.
M/S ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a faceless income tax assessment order passed without issuing a mandatory show-cause notice and remanded the matter for fresh proceedings with an opportunity of hearing.
M/S. TRANS INDIA LOGISTICS v. GSTO, WARD-60 & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST demand order due to denial of hearing and procedural lapses, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court's decision.
Kamini Malhotra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act do not lapse where possession is deemed taken by the Supreme Court, directing compensation payment upon compliance with procedural requirements.
OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PVT LTD v. MUNMUN GHOSH PROPRIETOR M S 66 IN GUEST HOUSE & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into merits.
LT Governor of Delhi v. Dr Davindera Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the reversion of an employee's promotion for concealment of a criminal case, holding that natural justice requires a proper show-cause notice before such adverse action.
Gaurav Singh Sengan v. Bhanwar Lal
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, holding that medical expert reports can only be interfered with on limited grounds which were absent in this case.
Gaurav Singh Sengan v. KM Madhu
The Delhi High Court held that the Tribunal erred in directing a fresh medical examination without valid grounds, upholding the consistent medical reports declaring the respondent medically unfit.
Gaurav Singh Sengan v. Ajeet Kumar Yadav
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, holding that consistent medical reports declaring the respondent unfit due to hypertension cannot be interfered with absent valid grounds.
B.K. Singh v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of dereliction of duty against a customs appraiser for failing to verify the nature of detained goods and insisted on mandatory clearances, dismissing the writ petition challenging the administrative tribunal's order.
Ms. Minakshi Singh v. Amrish Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a fresh medical examination by a specialist to determine the respondent's fitness for appointment, emphasizing procedural fairness and finality in recruitment medical assessments.
Sharpline Broadcast Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 58 Zone 4
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders and directed the petitioner to file a statutory appeal, deferring the validity of impugned GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Sharpline Broadcast Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 58 Zone 4
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders passed without proper notice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a fair hearing, while leaving the validity of deadline-extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Uma Lata Sharma v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that cash loans violating Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act do not invalidate legally enforceable debts under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and allowed the appeal against acquittal for cheque dishonour.
Tafseer Ahmad v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed joint inspection and scientific demarcation of disputed land to protect possession rights, allowing the petitioner’s presence and deferring demolition until demarcation completion.