Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Manoj Kaul v. State of NCT & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 138 NI Act, holding that prosecution must continue where the complainant has not been fully compensated and the accused issued dishonoured post-dated cheques after settlement.
Prakash Kaur v. State
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a Section 340 Cr.P.C. application and upheld the Sessions Court's rejection of the appeal as time barred, holding that the criminal court should not entertain frivolous applications when civil remedies are available.
Mausumi Bhattacharjee v. State
The Delhi High Court held that a Magistrate must conduct a proper inquiry before rejecting a Section 91 Cr.P.C. application for production of documents and cannot dismiss it solely on the ground of delay.
RE/MAX, LLC v. GULSHAN BAJAJ AND ORS
The Delhi High Court granted ex-parte permanent injunction to RE/MAX against defendants using the deceptively similar mark 'REALMAXX' in real estate, affirming trademark protection and procedural principles for ex-parte commercial suits.
Kehar Singh Saini v. Amar Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal, upholding concurrent findings that he failed to prove possession or title over shop no.72, thereby justifying dismissal of his suit for permanent injunction.
Sarvesh Agrawal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a writ petition challenging the recruitment process by the NGT, directing a fresh hearing with all affected candidates impleaded to ensure fairness and transparency.
Suraj Bhan v. State
The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC and modified the sentence accordingly, while upholding other convictions.
Malkhan Meena & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties amicably settled their dispute and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Someshwar Bharti & Ors. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Dharmender & Ors v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D/34 IPC and Protection of Civil Rights Act following an amicable settlement and the complainant's refusal to prosecute further.
Narayan Pramanik v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties amicably settled their disputes and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Metenuo Kechu v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, on the basis of a full settlement and payment, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
MR. PRASHANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Rahul & Ors v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Vijay Manchanda v. Vishal Gems & Jewels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expedite and conclude the pending Section 138 NI Act complaint within nine months due to undue delay.
LILADHAR RAMCHANDANI & ORS v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Haryana Essential Services Maintenance Act following the withdrawal of a nurses' strike and government consent, emphasizing the restoration of peace and futility of continuing proceedings.
Sajid Iqbal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 454, 380, 411, and 34 IPC following a settlement between the parties and the complainant's refusal to proceed with the complaint.
Mohd Salauddin & Anr v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under IPC Sections 452, 308, and 34 based on an amicable settlement between neighbors, emphasizing the ends of justice and restoration of peace.
Hemant @ Sunil v. The State, GNCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner charged under Sections 307/452/34 IPC due to weak prosecution evidence and absence of injury, subject to conditions.
versus
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving IPC and SC & ST (POA) Act charges, finding no prima facie case against him under the Act.