Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Nitin Sofat & Anr v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes through mediation and obtained a mutual consent divorce.
Sonu Kumar & Bhawna Kumari & Ors. v. State of GNCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under dowry and cruelty laws arising from matrimonial discord after the parties reconciled and the complainant withdrew charges.
Dhirender Pratap Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes through mediation and mutual consent divorce.
Ankur Mutreja v. Aechbs
The High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the petitioner's application to strike out allegedly irrelevant and baseless allegations in the respondent's reply, affirming that relevance and admissibility of evidence are to be determined at trial.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Surajpal & Ors.
The High Court held that under Section 44(1)(c) of the Money Laundering Act, a scheduled offence case must be transferred to the specific Special Court handling the related money laundering complaint, setting aside orders transferring it elsewhere.
Suresh Singhal v. A K Acharya
The High Court allowed the petition challenging the refund of settlement amount under Section 138 NI Act, directing the amount to be deposited with the court pending trial due to respondent's default and proclaimed offender status.
Phoolwati Tokas v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a matrimonial dispute case upon settlement and cooperation with investigation, subject to conditions.
Phoolwati Tokas v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a matrimonial dispute case following a settlement and their cooperation with the investigation, imposing conditions to protect the trial process.
Phoolwati Tokas v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners in a matrimonial dispute FIR after amicable settlement and cooperation with investigation, subject to conditions.
Gagandeep Singh @ Gaggi v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a murder case, relying on evidence of intimidation of witnesses and lack of independent prosecution support, subject to stringent bail conditions.
Girdhar Tulani & Anr. v. Kanta Hiranandani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for partition of a property allocated by oral family settlement to a deceased heir, dismissing the appeal challenging maintainability and non-joinder of other heirs.
M/S B. R. FABRICATIONS v. SHAKTI FOOD PRODUCTS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a money recovery suit due to the plaintiff's failure to prove delivery of goods with corroborative evidence, upholding the trial court's dismissal.
Sanjay Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. Sony Pictures Networks India P Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a copyright infringement suit, holding that a TV show concept alone is not copyrightable and no breach of confidentiality occurred.
Sunil @ Sonu v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside murder convictions based on circumstantial evidence due to unreliable key witness testimony, doubtful recoveries, and failure to exclude reasonable doubt.
Avneet Soni v. Kavita Agarwal
The Delhi High Court held that assignable rights under an Agreement to Sell constitute attachable property under Section 60(1) CPC and are liable to attachment in execution of a decree.
Nancy Rustagi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the petitioner to retain her MBBS seat at Lady Hardinge Medical College, holding that arbitrary cancellation and allotment to a different course without valid justification violates the candidate's rights and freedom of choice.
Fakhruddin v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the East Delhi Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for permission to remove goods from sealed premises, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Dinesh Kumar Saini v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the municipal authority to consider the petitioner's application for permission to remove goods from sealed premises, emphasizing procedural fairness.
Gautam Dass and Ors. v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the South Delhi Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioners' application for permission to remove goods from a sealed property within two weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Virender Kumar v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the East Delhi Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for permission to remove goods from sealed premises, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.