Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the East Delhi Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for permission to remove goods from sealed premises, granting limited relief under Article 226.
Umardin v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court directed the East Delhi Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for permission to remove goods from sealed premises, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nafe Singh & Ors; Munesh & Ors; Krishan Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 must strictly follow the Second Schedule, reducing the Tribunal's award accordingly and affirming entitlement of legal heirs of the deceased driver under a comprehensive insurance policy.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Anil Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for grievous injury in motor accident, holding insurer liable as vehicle had valid permit at accident time and applying correct principles for disability and future prospects.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Anil Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for grievous injury in motor accident, holding insurer liable despite permit issues and correcting disability and income assessment.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Prabhabati Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and enhanced the compensation awarded to the claimants in a fatal motor accident case, applying the Supreme Court's ruling on future prospects and non-pecuniary damages.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Prabhabati Devi
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying the Supreme Court's Pranay Sethi principles on future prospects and non-pecuniary damages, while dismissing the insurer's plea for exoneration.
M/S Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd. v. Sushil Kumar Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a recovery suit where the plaintiff failed to lead evidence despite multiple opportunities, affirming the trial court's discretion to close evidence and dismiss the suit.
N.B TIWARI v. KALKA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that an employee's resignation is deemed accepted under Rule 114A if not formally accepted within 30 days, dismissing the appeal for reinstatement despite the appellant's claimed conditional resignation.
ERA BUSINESS SCHOOL v. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION
The Delhi High Court set aside AICTE's order rejecting restoration of intake due to failure in communication of hearing notice and directed a fresh hearing to uphold the right to be heard.
Ascertiva India Private Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator’s petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of Ascertiva India Private Limited upon satisfaction of statutory requirements and solvency declaration.
Sanju Kunwar & Ors. v. Union of India
Delhi High Court allowed appeal awarding Rs.8 lakhs compensation with interest to claimants for death due to railway untoward incident, applying Supreme Court's beneficial legislation principle.
Avery India Ltd. v. Nirmal Kumar Jain and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that partition among co-owners does not split an existing tenancy into multiple tenancies absent fresh agreements, upholding the decree for mesne profits and dismissing the second appeal.
Rajender Prasad v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing re-fixation of pension as per revised pay scales and quashing of erroneous PPOs, following its earlier judgment in Kanwal Singh.
Madanlal v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions resisting eviction from public land occupied without title, affirming that eviction orders upheld by the Supreme Court cannot be challenged by raising new pleas.
S/tiv Shankar & Others v. Delhi Development Authority & Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging eviction orders but granted conditional time to vacate premises until December 2019 subject to affidavits undertaking peaceful possession, aligning with Supreme Court directions.
(iii) the Supreme Court has dismissed the SLPs vide order dated v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr. but has, subject to the
The Delhi High Court dismissed eviction petitions as withdrawn, granting petitioners time until December 2019 to vacate premises subject to affidavits of undertaking, aligning with the Supreme Court's earlier order.
Vijat Jain v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal petitions at the pre-charge stage with liberty to raise the same contentions at the charge stage, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn.
Sukhdev Singh & Ors. v. Registrar of Companies
The Delhi High Court held that it has jurisdiction to stay voluntary winding up under Section 518(1)(b) of the Companies Act, 1956 and allowed the petition to revive the solvent company pending litigation.
Sandeep Singh Bhatia v. The State Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR alleging forgery of a partition deed, holding that prior civil settlements did not bar criminal investigation into the document's authenticity.