Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Delhi Development Authority v. Diwan Chand & Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:5965

The Delhi High Court allowed DDA's second appeal setting aside lower courts' finding on property ownership but maintained injunction protecting respondents' possession against demolition without due process.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Regular Second Appeal permanent injunction due process of law Khasra number

M Jeychandren v. Union of India

13 Sep 2018 · The Chief Justice; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:5964-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal to grant the appellant a fresh opportunity to argue interlocutory applications dismissed earlier solely due to non-argument by counsel, emphasizing merits over procedural lapses.

civil appeal_allowed interlocutory application amendment of plaint ad interim relief Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Prabhatam Investments Pvt Ltd v. State & Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:5972

The Delhi High Court held that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to bypass the bar on second revision petitions under Section 397(3) CrPC in the absence of special circumstances, dismissing the petition seeking police investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 397(3) CrPC Section 156(3) CrPC revision petition

TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD v. SHREE SHYAM PULP & BOARD MILLS LTD

13 Sep 2018 · JAYANT NATH · 2018:DHC:5963

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT under Section 434 proviso, impleading UCO Bank as party and revoking the Official Liquidator's appointment to facilitate corporate insolvency resolution.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 434 Companies Act 2013 winding up proceedings transfer to NCLT Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016

APLLE ALLOYS PVT LTD v. Union of India and Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:5958

The Delhi High Court held that penalty under Section 21(5) of the MMDR Act applies only if minerals are raised without lawful authority and remanded the matter to determine if such unlawful raising occurred.

administrative other Significant Section 21(5) MMDR Act penalty for illegal mining lawful authority mineral transportation

Shahida Begum & Ors. v. Dr. Ajit Kumar Singla & Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:5962-DB

Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with court directions on unauthorized construction dismissed as respondents complied subject to statutory appeals and procedural constraints.

administrative petition_dismissed Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Unauthorized construction Demolition order Statutory appeal

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central-3 v. Bhavi Chand Jindal

13 Sep 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:5968-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271AAA where the assessee disclosed undisclosed income and substantiated its derivation during assessment proceedings despite not specifying the manner in the Section 132(4) statement.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271AAA undisclosed income penalty Section 132(4) statement

Santosh Kumari Chadha v. Railway Employees CHGS Ltd. & Anr.

13 Sep 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:5969-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of late Santosh Kumari Chadha's legal representatives to possession of flat No. 39, directing prompt consideration of eligibility objections and warning against obstruction by the Co-operative Society.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Co-operative Society membership possession of flat eligibility objection belated challenge

Naveen Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:5956-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the petitioner’s termination and remanded the matter for reconsideration, holding that Screening Committees must consider acquittals and provide reasoned decisions before rejecting candidature on criminal case grounds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant termination of service criminal case acquittal suppression of information Screening Committee

Food Corporation of India v. M/S Gupta Rice & General Mills

13 Sep 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:5976

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitration award that dismissed FCI's claims solely due to the respondent's non-appearance, holding that an arbitrator must decide claims on merits and cannot terminate proceedings without adjudication.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration non-appearance termination of proceedings arbitration award

United India Insurance Co Ltd. v. Pappu Deo Yadav

13 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5957
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for grievous injury in motor accident, rejected insurer's plea of contributory negligence, and clarified principles on future prospects and payment for artificial limbs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation permanent disability future prospects

United India Insurance Co Ltd. v. Pappu Deo Yadav

13 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5961
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's jurisdiction, rejected contributory negligence, and enhanced compensation for permanent injury while clarifying the applicability of future prospects and directing payment for prosthetics through recognized agencies.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation permanent disability future prospects

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rambir Singh & Ors; Pawan Kumar & Ors

13 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5959
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partially allowed insurer’s appeals in motor accident claims by reducing compensation awarded for death and injury, emphasizing absence of contributory negligence evidence and disallowing future prospects addition in injury claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation contributory negligence future prospects

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rambir Singh & Ors; Pawan Kumar & Ors

13 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5960
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's compensation awards by reducing amounts based on contributory negligence principles, disallowing future prospects for the injured, and mandating deduction for personal expenses of the deceased.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation composite negligence contributory negligence future prospects

Nirmala Jain and Ors. v. Jasbir Singh and Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:5955-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of an auction purchaser as a party in arbitration proceedings and allowed possession of the disputed property subject to status quo, recognizing that third parties may be bound by arbitration agreements in composite transactions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement third party impleadment group of companies doctrine status quo order

Ankur Gupta v. State & Anr.

13 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:5967

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that the complainant failed to prove the existence of a legally enforceable debt and refused to admit additional evidence on appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque legally enforceable debt additional evidence on appeal

H S Oberoi & Ors. v. M/S. Dura Build Care Pvt Ltd

13 Sep 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:5935

The Delhi High Court reduced the pendente lite and future interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum in a suit for recovery of amounts for supply of goods, holding that the higher rate was excessive and applicable only in dishonoured cheque cases.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interest rate Section 34 CPC Section 80 Negotiable Instruments Act pendente lite interest

Shabana Rehman v. Mamta Biswas & Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:5971

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal holding that a plea of bar under Order II Rule 2 CPC must be proved and pressed below and that concurrent findings of fact on possession suit cannot be disturbed in second appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order II Rule 2 CPC Regular Second Appeal cause of action concurrent findings of fact

Jaswin Arora v. Harmeet Singh Sood & Ors.

13 Sep 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:5970
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of subsequent purchasers as necessary parties in a suit for specific performance, emphasizing bona fide conduct and the doctrine of lis pendens.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance impleadment subsequent purchaser Section 19(b) Specific Relief Act

UPSRTC v. Nirmala Devi & Ors.

12 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:5912

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging a motor accident compensation award, upholding the Tribunal's finding of bus driver negligence and liability of the bus owner.

civil appeal_dismissed motor accident claim compensation negligence vehicle involvement