Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Goldi Arora & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

26 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6238

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act matrimonial dispute

Robin Raju v. State

26 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6235

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a motor vehicle accident after the parties amicably settled their disputes and the complainants withdrew prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR motor vehicle accident settlement Section 279 IPC

Dr. Kimti Lal v. Harpal Singh & Anr

26 Sep 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:6236
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's decree for specific performance, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove continuous readiness and financial capacity and had paid only nominal consideration, thus disentitling them from specific performance.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness financial capacity Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act

Shashi Cables Ltd. v. Directorate General of Foreign Trade

26 Sep 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2018:DHC:6241

The Delhi High Court upheld the DGFT's discretionary rejection of the petitioner's request for extension of Duty Free Import Authorization, holding that commercial risk does not constitute genuine hardship warranting relief under the Foreign Trade Policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Duty Free Import Authorization Foreign Trade Policy Policy Relaxation Committee genuine hardship

Mahesh Chander Sharma v. Chameli Devi & Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:6232

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court’s partition decree and holding that an oral family settlement must be proved by cogent evidence, not mere self-serving statements.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant family settlement partition suit oral family settlement relinquishment deed

Master Abhishek Mehra & Ors. v. JLG Retails Ltd & Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · DHC:6258 2011

The Delhi High Court held that acceptance of part payment 'without prejudice' does not discharge the entire liability under an arbitral award and allowed the execution appeal restoring the execution application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Execution of decree Without prejudice Receipt-cum-Undertaking

Shekhar Arora v. Ram Kripal Yadav

26 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:6259

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding the partial decree for rent arrears while setting aside claims based on unproved ledger entries and affirming the dismissal of delayed additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Rent Agreement Ledger entries Order XLI Rule 27 CPC Additional evidence

Phool Wati Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:6254-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation paid, declaring lapse for 14 bighas of land and directing compensation payment.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) of 2013 Act possession compensation

M/S MMTC LTD. v. SHRI K.K. SAXENA

26 Sep 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:6246

The Delhi High Court held that pre-deposit of gratuity amount is mandatory for appeal under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, but the Appellate Authority must afford hearing before deciding limitation, restoring the appeal upon deposit.

labor petition_allowed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 7(7) pre-deposit appeal maintainability

Girjesh @ Babloo v. State

26 Sep 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:6230-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murdering his wife by setting her on fire based on a reliable dying declaration and corroborative evidence, while acquitting him of causing injury to his daughter.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC kerosene fire burn injuries

Jagmohan Singh v. Kuljeet Kaur & Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · Chief Justice; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:6248-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of electricity connection to the respondent in a disputed property, holding that such provision does not create or affect property rights.

civil appeal_dismissed electricity connection property dispute essential utilities right to service

Ritu Sharma v. Rajbir Singh

26 Sep 2018 · Chief Justice; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:6247-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an injunction order after the appellant had admitted before the trial court that she did not obstruct the plaintiff's access to the suit premises.

civil appeal_dismissed injunction ex-parte injunction prima facie case balance of convenience

Satya Narayan Prasad v. Election Commission of India

26 Sep 2018 · Rajendra Menon; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:6243-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking disqualification of candidates who lose Lok Sabha elections from contesting Rajya Sabha elections, holding that such disqualifications must be legislated and cannot be judicially mandated.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 Election Commission of India Rajya Sabha elections

Arun Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · Rajendra Menon; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:6242-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging recovery orders, holding that statutory appeal under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 is the exclusive remedy and writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 Section 30 Article 226 writ petition maintainability

North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Shashi Wife & L.R. of Late Sh. Naresh Kumar

26 Sep 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:6245

The Delhi High Court held that daily wagers employed by the North Delhi Municipal Corporation qualify as employees under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and are entitled to gratuity, dismissing the petition challenging the gratuity award.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 daily wager employee definition gratuity claim

Pramjeet Kaushik & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

26 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6240

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial discord Section 498A IPC settlement

Suresh Mishra v. The State & Anr.

26 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6239

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 354, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's refusal to prosecute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement deed complainant refusal to prosecute

Vijay Kumar v. Dilip Kumar

26 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:6250

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonour case due to the petitioner's failure to prove the existence of a valid partnership and legally enforceable debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Partnership firm Retirement deed

Mai Chand v. Rampal

26 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:6253

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the trial and first appellate courts' decree granting permanent injunction to the declared bhumidhar against dispossession from agricultural land, affirming the presumption of possession based on statutory revenue records.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 bhumidhar possession permanent injunction

Suresh Kumar & Ors. v. Rajiv Bhayana & Anr.

26 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:6252

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the land acquisition compensation claim for fresh adjudication after permitting appellants to produce vital documents and pay costs, holding that procedural non-compliance due to advocate miscommunication warranted leniency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 54 Land Acquisition Act Section 151 CPC Section 105 CPC