Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Manoj Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court partly modified motor accident compensation awards, affirming insured vehicle involvement and applying Supreme Court precedents to reassess damages.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Manoj Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed appeals in a motor accident claim, confirming insured vehicle involvement and modifying compensation in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Ajay Sharma & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties amicably settled the dispute and the complainant withdrew criminal charges.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co Ltd v. Gaurav Swaroop
Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation awards by upholding insurer’s contributory negligence challenge, adjusting disability assessment, reducing interest rate to 9%, and directing direct payment of future medical expenses.
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd v. M/S Banaco Overseas
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitration award directing NAFED to reimburse losses and demurrage charges for failure to supply perishable Maize, holding that new pleas not raised before the arbitrator cannot be entertained.
Newhilla K Marak v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking to retain a higher-grade government quarter post the death of the allottee spouse, holding no entitlement without statutory backing and affirming the eviction under the Meghalaya Public Premises Act.
Gift Centre (Khushal) v. Indian Tourism Development Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld damage charges of Rs.370 per sq.ft. per month as mesne profits payable by unauthorized occupants under the Public Premises Act, rejecting challenges based on alleged lack of evidence and 'without prejudice' offers.
M/S ARORA H/W & PAINT STORE v. M/S JAWAHAR CHITS (P) LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree in a chit fund recovery suit, ruling the suit was within limitation and arbitration clause was waived due to non-pleading.
Naved Haider Kajmi & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
Delhi High Court upheld FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, ruling territorial jurisdiction proper and that settlement does not bar reopening of harassment complaints.
Imran v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 376D IPC and POCSO Act, observing insufficient direct evidence and imposing conditions to safeguard the trial and victim.
Sandeep v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of dowry harassment and related charges, citing inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and the suicide note.
Gopal Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing restoration of peace and ends of justice.
Surender Kumar Pandey v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354-A, 509, and 323 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed.
Satish Kumar Mishra v. Megha Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement existed despite forgery allegations, relying on forensic evidence and part performance, and referred the disputes to arbitration while dismissing challenges to the agreement's authenticity.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. M/S Gaurav Enterprise
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting MTNL's claim of novation of contract and affirmed limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act, dismissing MTNL's appeal.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. M/S Gaurav Enterprise
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing MTNL's challenge to the contract rate revision, holding that no novation occurred without mutual consent and limiting judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.
State GNCT Delhi v. Mohd. Faisal
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to lack of credible evidence and the prosecution's failure to rebut the possibility of a counterblast FIR.
State v. Maya Dahiya
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of Maya Dahiya for assault causing grievous hurt under Section 325 IPC due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and inconclusive medical proof.
Sonu @ Tinku v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's unwillingness to proceed.
Deepak Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing the trial court to re-summon prosecution witnesses for cross-examination after new evidence was produced, emphasizing the accused's right to a fair opportunity to challenge evidence.