Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Kismat Singh v. Piariya Devi & Ors.

27 Sep 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:6269
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held the principal employer liable to pay compensation under Section 12 of the Employee's Compensation Act for death of an employee assaulted during the course of employment, rejecting the appellant's denial of employment and incident location.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 Section 12 liability principal employer contractor

Radio Next Webcastion Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

27 Sep 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:6268

The Delhi High Court held that the Intellectual Property Appellate Board has jurisdiction to hear copyright matters despite the absence of a technical member (copyright), setting aside the order refusing to list the petitioner's application.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Intellectual Property Appellate Board Copyright Act, 1957 Trade Marks Act, 1999 technical member (copyright)

M/S TARA CHAND SUMIT CONST. CO. v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

27 Sep 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:6291

The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking debarment order against a contractor for failure to comply with natural justice, directing issuance of a fresh show cause notice and speaking order.

administrative petition_allowed Significant show cause notice natural justice speaking order debarment

Madan Lal v. Central Board of Secondary Education

27 Sep 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:6292

The Delhi High Court directed CBSE to correct inadvertent errors in parents' names on school certificates, emphasizing a prudent and sensitive application of bye-laws under Article 226.

administrative petition_allowed Significant clerical error certificate correction Central Board of Secondary Education parents' names

M/S THE RAMESHWARA JUTE MILLS LIMITED v. M/S UNIVERSAL CABLES LIMITED

27 Sep 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:6287-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals by consent, maintaining interim status quo on disputed shares allotted under a Rights Issue pending final adjudication by the Single Judge on applications under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC interim relief status quo Rights Issue

Skyline Engineering Contracts (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Centex International Pvt. Ltd.

27 Sep 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:6266

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator due to absence of a valid, signed arbitration agreement or clear incorporation of an arbitration clause in the contract between the parties.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement incorporation by reference Section 7(5) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator

Umesh Verma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Sep 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:6284

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging forgery and criminal conspiracy, holding that ongoing investigations supported by prima facie evidence cannot be interfered with under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR forgery malafide intention

Nitin Gautam v. State

27 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:8195

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail applications as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if the petitioner's proclaimed offender status is set aside.

criminal appeal_dismissed Procedural bail application proclaimed offender withdrawal of petition revision petition

Rakesh Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation

27 Sep 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:4982-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for condonation of a 3395-day delay in filing an appeal, holding that financial hardship alone does not constitute sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 sufficient cause financial hardship

Gaurav Dalmia v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors

26 Sep 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:8646

The Delhi High Court held that show cause notices to alleged wilful defaulters are not final orders and dismissed petitions seeking to quash such notices at the preliminary stage.

administrative petition_dismissed wilful defaulter show cause notice credit information companies loan default

Rajender v. Yogender Tyagi

26 Sep 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:6231

The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed before the expiry of the mandatory 15-day period after service of legal notice is premature and not maintainable, dismissing the appeal against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Legal notice Cause of action

Vishal Vinay Bhatt & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi

26 Sep 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6237

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute settlement

Ranu Enterprises & Anr. v. Malanpur Captive Power Ltd.

26 Sep 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:6251
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the termination of arbitration proceedings due to petitioners' advocate's default, emphasizing that litigants should not suffer for their lawyers' negligence and remitted the matter for adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 25 termination of arbitration statement of claim

Shamim Akhtar v. Dinesh Chand & Anr

26 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6260
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court reduced the compensation awarded for motor accident injuries, upheld 85% disability assessment, directed provision of an artificial limb at reasonable cost by the insurer, and granted interest at 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability compensation quantum artificial limb cost

Shamim Akhtar v. Dinesh Chand & Anr

26 Sep 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6261
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court partly allowed appeals in a motor accident claim by upholding 85% disability, reducing compensation excluding artificial limb cost, directing insurer to provide limb at reasonable cost, and granting interest at 9% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim functional disability loss of earning capacity artificial limb cost

Sarika Jain v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:8645-DB

The Delhi High Court held that eligibility and cadre allocation in the Civil Services Examination must be governed by the rules prevailing at the time of the examination, and changes in subsequent years cannot be applied retrospectively to alter a candidate's appointment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Civil Services Examination UPSC Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 functional classification

Pastor Securities Limited v. Official Liquidator

26 Sep 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:6257

The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator’s petition for voluntary winding up of Pastor Securities Limited, ordering its dissolution upon compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.

corporate petition_allowed Companies Act, 1956 voluntary winding up Declaration of Solvency Official Liquidator

Mr Pramod Kumar Ahuja, Advocate. v. GOVERNMENT OF N.C.T. OF DELHI AND ORS.

26 Sep 2018 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU; 26.09.2018 · 2018:DHC:8647

The Delhi High Court directed DSIIDC to convert petitioners' industrial sheds from leasehold to freehold upon deposit of conversion charges despite a dispute with DDA over entitlement to those charges, holding the charges pending final adjudication.

property petition_allowed Significant leasehold to freehold conversion industrial sheds Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Delhi Development Authority

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi v. Mary Pratibhakujur

26 Sep 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Central Administrative Tribunal orders, applying the principle of parity of reasoning with earlier decisions and upholding the impugned orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition Central Administrative Tribunal impugned order parity of reasoning

Naresh Kumar Sharma and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

26 Sep 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:6262-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking reinstatement and regularization of Home Guards, holding that their voluntary status under the Bombay Home Guards Act precludes such relief, but allowed fresh enrollment applications subject to eligibility.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Home Guards Regularization Voluntary service Bombay Home Guards Act, 1947