Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of
JUDGMENT
PHOOL WATI GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr S.K. Rout and Mr Aman Mehrotra, Advs
Through: Mr Siddharth Panda, Adv for LAC Mr Nikhil Rohatgi and Mr Shashank
Khurana, Advs
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J. (ORAL)
1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings pertaining to 24 bighas and 18 biswas land of the petitioners comprised in khasra Nos. 6(1-0), 7(1-0), 54(1-5), 57(0-5), 58(0-4), 59(0-6), 60(0-5), 204 & 244(1-0), 236/2/2(4-03), 239(1-11), 240(2-17), 241(2-11), 242(3-18), 246(1-0), 247(1-0), 293/190(1-7) and 294/190(1-7) situated in the revenue estate of Village Shakarpur Khas, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and 2018:DHC:6254-DB Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as '2013 Act') as neither the physical possession was taken nor compensation paid.
2. In this case the notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act was issued on 13.11.1959, Section 6 declaration was made on 18.03.1966. Thereafter an Award bearing No. 07/1969 was passed on 26.07.1969.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that the predecessor in interest of the petitioners had purchased the said land between the years 1962-1970. Upon the demise of Sh. Jawahar Lal Gupta on 28.11.2007, the present petitioners succeeded to the estate of Sh. Jawahar Lal Gupta being the wife, sons i.e., legal heirs of Sh. Jawahar Lal Gupta.
4. Mr Panda, learned counsel for the LAC has placed reliance on the counter affidavit so filed, more particularly, para 7 which we reproduce below and annexure R1/1 which provides the details of the payments made to some of the legal heirs and with respect to the areas of which part possession has been taken. Para 7 of the Counter affidavit is reproduced hereinafter:- “7. That it is submitted that the part possession of the subject land was taken over on various dates i.e., 20/08/70, 09.07.71, 25.11.71, 25.12.71 and 01.06.77 and handed over to the beneficiary department. Further, part compensation was paid to the recorded owner with respect to this khasra number. A copy of the schedule showing the details of lands of which possession has been taken over and payment has been made to the recorded owners are mentioned is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure R1/1.” Annexure R1/1 is reproduced below:- Item No. Name of recorded owner Khasra No. & Area Bigha Biswa Compensatio n assessed in Rs. Possession has been taken over Possession has not been taken over Remarks
2 Sh. Tote s/o Sukh Ram ½ share 54 (2-5), 59 (0-12), 60 (0-12), 241 (2- 11), 242 (3-18), 293/190 (1-7) & 294/190 (1-7) with other khasra nos. 24482.88/- Khasra Nos. 54 (1-5), 59 (0-6), 60(0-5) 241 (2-11), 242 (3-18), taken on 09/07/71 & 25/12/71 Khasra nos. 54 (1-0), 59 (0-6), 60 (0-7), not taken As per RD Register No entry made for payment.
26 Sh. Baderi s/o shera 6 (3-0) & 7 (3-0) with other khasra nos. 17514.32/- Taken on 20/08/70 - 1. As per RD Register Amount Rs. 4273.21 paid to Sh. Ram Dass s/o Shera on 23-01-82.
2. As per RD 4273.21 paid to sh. Bhola s/o Shera on 11/02/82.
3. As per RD 8546.42 paid to sh. Bhola s/o Shera on 11/02/82.
4. As per RD
708.18 paid to sh. Indarpal Jain s/o shri Niwas jain on 27 Sh. Bhola s/o shera Do 17514.32/- Do -
5. As per RD 3186.81 paid to sh. on 09/11/79.
6. As per RD 4651.43 paid to sh. on 15/05/80.
54 Sh. Ram Chander S/o Singh Ram 58 (0-5), 204 (1-4), 244 (0-15), 246 (2- 2) & 247 (2-2) nos. 91,256.45/with other khasra nos. 58 (0-4), 204 (1-4), 244 (0-
15) & 247 (2-
2) taken 25/11/71 & 01/06/77 58 (0-14) not taken As per RD Register:-
1. Rs. 4,352.09/- paid to Smt. Hemlata Jain on 19.03.76
2. Rs. 198.99 paid to Sh. Om Prakash Gupta on 25.01.84
3. Rs. 198.99 paid to Smt. Bhagwati Devi on 12.12.86
4. Rs. 198.99 paid to Smt. Kala Devi on 19.12.86
5. Rs. 198.99 paid to Sh. Chander Ram on 20.04.89
6. Rs. 7,561.62 Sent to ADJ Delhi 30- 31 on 01.08.90
7. Rs. 4,352.09 paid to Smt. Satyawati on 03.04.91
58 Sh. Umrao s/o Richhpal payment. 59 Sh. Ram Saran s/o Richhpal payment. 60 Sh. Mangat s/o Ram Lal Do 56152.07/- Do - As per RD Register payment. 112 Sh. Trilok Chand s/o Har sahai 239 (1-19) & 240 (2-17) with other khasra Nos. 21276.90/- 239 (1-19) taken 240 (2-17) not taken Amount Rs. 8980.51 paid to Sh. Trilok Chand on 20/05/78.
5. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties.
6. Mr Rout, learned counsel for the petitioners agrees that the acquisition proceedings would lapse not with respect to the entire subject land i.e., 24 bighas 18 biswas but only 14 bighas, details of which are reproduced below:- “Khasra Nos. 54(1-0), 57(0-5), 58(0-04), 59(0-6), 60(0-5), 240(2-17), 241(2-11), 242(3-18), 293/190(1-3), 294/190(1-7)”
7. He further submits that as far as the land falling in khasra No. 236/2/2 measuring 6 bighas 16 biswas is concerned, a separate writ petition is to be filed as the present award is not with respect to the aforesaid area. The details of the above khasra numbers have been jointly provided by the counsels from the extracted part of the counter affidavit which has been filed. According to the counter affidavit filed, from the aforesaid khasra numbers it is clear that neither compensation has been paid for some khasra numbers nor physical possession has been taken for some khasra numbers.
8. Resultantly, the writ petition is allowed in part. The acquisition proceedings pertaining to the Khasra Nos. 54(1-0), 57(0-5), 58(0-04), 59(0- 6), 60(0-5), 240(2-17), 241(2-11), 242(3-18), 293/190(1-3), 294/190(1-7) admeasuring 14 bighas are deemed to have lapsed. Leave as prayed is granted to the petitioners to take recourse to such remedy as available in accordance with law pertaining to khasra No. 236/2/2 measuring 6 bigha 16 biswas out of which possession of 4 bighas 3 biswas has already been taken. The petitioners are only praying for grant of compensation. Compensation would be released within a period of one year.
9. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. G.S.SISTANI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 SU