Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Land & Building Department & Anr

05 Oct 2018 · G.S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:6505-DB

The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid within five years of the award despite physical possession being taken.

property petition_allowed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 compensation

Mohd. Sagir v. BSES and Anr

05 Oct 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:6514

The Delhi High Court awarded Rs.15 lakh compensation with interest to a petitioner who suffered arm amputation due to electrocution caused by unauthorized construction and held both the property owner and electricity company jointly liable with apportioned negligence.

civil petition_allowed Significant electrocution compensation unauthorized construction composite negligence

Hemant Kumar Arya v. Sangeet Natak Akademi; Chandranshu Mehta v. Sangeet Natak Akademi

05 Oct 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:8660-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging the quashing of appointments made without mandatory Ministry representation on the selection committee, holding such appointments illegal and void despite the appointees' continued service.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant recruitment rules selection committee Ministry of Culture representative appointment nullity

Chaudhary v. State NCT of Delhi

05 Oct 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:8434

The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a violent assault case, recognizing self-defense plea and imposing strict conditions to safeguard investigation and trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail self-defense cross FIR Section 308 IPC

Shri Cretan Marwah & Anr. v. State & Anr.

05 Oct 2018 · A. K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8280

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs and related criminal proceedings based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement voluntary withdrawal

Bata India Limited v. Subhash Kapoor & Ors.

05 Oct 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:6504

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to include additional facts relevant to the trademark dispute, emphasizing the principles governing amendments under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC Order 1 Rule 10 CPC bona fide amendment

Nitin Rose & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Oct 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:6503-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the application in W.P.(C) 9921/2015 in terms of an earlier order passed in a connected writ petition, without further elaboration.

other other Writ Petition Union of India Delhi High Court Application allowed

Hansraj & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Oct 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:6502-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to honor the original option given to petitioners to continue in the Subordinate Statistical Service on earlier terms, rejecting the respondents' attempt to impose new prospective terms and repatriate petitioners without option.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Subordinate Statistical Service Office Memorandum option to continue repatriation

Sh. Nitin v. State & Anr

05 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6499

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354C, 354D, 506, and 509 IPC based on a settlement between parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further, subject to cost payment.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR settlement mediation Section 354C IPC

Vavasi Telegence Pvt Ltd v. Sehdev Yadav

05 Oct 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:6480

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the Labour Court's Award holding the termination of the workman illegal and unjustified, directing reinstatement with full back wages.

labor appeal_dismissed illegal termination unjustified termination Labour Court Award Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Rakesh Jain v. V.P. Yadav & Anr

05 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6500

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to order a field investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC but directed expeditious disposal of the complaint regarding obstruction of tenant's access.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 156(3) CrPC field investigation tenant rights access obstruction

Bharat & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6498

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a neighborly dispute over water usage based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's refusal to prosecute further.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR settlement criminal proceedings Section 323 IPC

Vaibhav Dattani & Anr. v. State & Anr.

05 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6501

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR settlement Section 406 IPC Section 420 IPC

Suhaib Ilyasi v. State

05 Oct 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:6479-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's murder conviction, holding the deceased's death was a suicide unsupported by evidence of homicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder suicide dowry harassment Section 302 IPC

M/S T G Leisure & Resorts (P) Ltd & Ors. v. M/S Ram Kumar Gupta (HUF)

05 Oct 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:6525

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that factual disputes regarding security deposit and lease termination cannot be decided at the quashing stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 Cr.P.C. dishonour of cheque security deposit

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Jitender @ Jeetu & Ors.

05 Oct 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6494
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to grant recovery rights against the owner and driver of a commercial vehicle who failed to produce the mandatory Route Permit, modifying the compensation award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Route Permit Recovery Rights Insurer's Subrogation

Pradeep Kumar Mittal v. Dinesh Kumar & Ors.

05 Oct 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6495
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing income on skilled wages, rejecting contributory negligence for driving without license, and awarding additional non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation assessment loss of earning capacity contributory negligence

Kalam @ Kalamuddin v. Dinesh & Ors.

05 Oct 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:6496
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation and interest awarded to an injured labourer in a motor accident claim, applying medical disability evidence and Supreme Court principles on future prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement functional disability future prospects

Fahad Ullah & Anr v. State & Ors

05 Oct 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:6497

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR for theft of electricity following an amicable settlement and payment of the assessed amount, emphasizing the ends of justice and futility of continuing criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR theft of electricity Section 379 IPC Section 135 Indian Electricity Act

Samrath Gupta v. M/S Madhuban Electronics Pvt Ltd

05 Oct 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:6526

The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition under Section 433(c) of the Companies Act, 1956, holding that non-commencement of main business alone does not justify winding up when the company is profitable and the substratum remains intact.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant Section 433(c) Companies Act 1956 winding up non-commencement of business minority shareholder grievance