Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Kavita v. The State (GNCT Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of cheating by promising employment abroad, considering her minor role, lack of direct money receipt, and family circumstances.
Vishwas Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged assault and allowed amendment of the bail application to include Section 174-A IPC, emphasizing non-prejudice to investigation.
Avdesh Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a robbery case due to weak prosecution evidence and lack of direct connection to the offence.
Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for robbery and conspiracy against appellants involved in a dacoity, clarifying that Section 395 IPC applies when five or more persons are involved and only the person armed with a deadly weapon can be convicted under Section 397 IPC.
DHARAMPAL@BABLOO@JUGAD v. STATE(GOVT.OF NOT OF DELHI)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application, holding that contradictions in prosecution evidence do not warrant bail when prima facie evidence implicates the accused.
Roman v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in an assault case where custodial interrogation was unnecessary and co-accused had been granted bail, imposing conditions to ensure investigation integrity.
Pradeep v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and wrongful restraint charges due to insufficient and unreliable prosecution evidence, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Vijay Krishan v. The State Trading Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that gratuity cannot be forfeited without actual termination of service under Section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and quashed the order withholding the petitioner's gratuity post-retirement.
Vijay Kumar Puri v. Rajinder Nath Puri
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for mesne profits against the appellant, rejecting his claims of ownership based on intestate succession and HUF status, affirming the validity of the probated Will disinheriting him.
Krishna Gupta v. Vipin Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that acceptance of rent estops a tenant from denying landlord's title and bona fide requirement justifies eviction.
Ram Sumer & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 308, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the complainants' refusal to prosecute further.
Pushpa & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified convictions from robbery to dacoity under Section 395 IPC involving five accused, upheld conspiracy charges, and clarified that hurt does not exclude Section 395 applicability.
Pushpa & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity under Section 395 IPC involving five accused, clarified the applicability of Section 397 IPC only to the armed accused, and affirmed conspiracy liability under Section 120B IPC.
Pushpa & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court modified convictions to dacoity under Section 395 IPC with conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, upheld the conviction of the armed accused under Section 397 IPC, and maintained sentences, clarifying the applicability of Sections 394 and 395 IPC in cases involving hurt and multiple offenders.
National Highways Authority of India v. North Bihar Highway Limited
The Delhi High Court held that parties are bound by agreed institutional arbitration rules including fee structures, and unilateral attempts to alter such terms post-constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal are impermissible, refusing to terminate the Tribunal's mandate.
Ayush Hotels & Resorts LLP v. Nitin Dev
The Delhi High Court held that objections regarding non-registration and inadequate stamping of a lease agreement do not affect the maintainability of an arbitration petition and such issues are to be decided by the arbitrator.
Deepanshi & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380, 411, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between related parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Gaurav Sachdeva & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of a full settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.
Davinder Kumar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a settlement and reconciliation between the parties.
Subhash v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed the simultaneous initiation of process under Sections 82 and 83 CrPC against the petitioner for non-compliance with procedural safeguards and directed him to appear before the Investigating Officer.