Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4 v. International Coal Ventures Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court issued notice to the respondent-assessee for consideration of issues raised in the income tax appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax.
Gurnam Singh v. G.I. Cosmetics
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the deceptively similar trademark 'MISS HEAVEN' on cosmetic products, holding it infringed the plaintiff's registered mark 'BLUE HEAVEN' and caused likely consumer confusion.
Urvashi Aggarwal & Anr. v. Kushagr Ansal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's dismissal of a suit for specific performance of a 1974 agreement to sell, holding the suit barred by limitation and the plaintiffs not ready and willing to perform.
Mohammed Ilyas Abha M A v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the grant of a minority scholarship to the petitioner, holding that a clerical error in bank details cannot justify denial of an otherwise eligible candidate’s benefit.
L’OREAL v. BRANDWORLD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that the online marketplace Shopclues.com is not a mere intermediary entitled to immunity under Section 79 of the IT Act due to its active role in facilitating sale of counterfeit L’OREAL products and granted injunction with directions to prevent infringement.
SKULLCANDY INC v. SHRI SHYAM TELECOM & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Shopclues.com, by actively participating in the sale of counterfeit 'SKULLCANDY' products and failing to exercise due diligence, is not entitled to immunity under Section 79 of the IT Act and is liable for trademark infringement.
M/S LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A & ANOTHER v. M/S MIFY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that an e-commerce platform actively participating in sale and guaranteeing authenticity of counterfeit goods cannot claim safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act and is liable for trademark infringement.
Jitender Kumar v. Vijender Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside a decree for specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove continuous readiness, willingness, and financial capacity, and held that payment of only nominal consideration after long delay disentitles specific performance relief.
Rohit Kumar v. Sunil Tyagi
The Delhi High Court held that a written settlement agreement signed by parties, including those executed through mediation, satisfies Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC and mandates disposal of the suit without addressing ancillary procedural questions.
Shiv Kant v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to adjudicate undervalued transactions and workers' claims following abatement of BIFR proceedings, continuing interim asset protection orders to safeguard workers' interests.
Karmveer Singh & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging the cancellation of ITBP Head Constable (Telecom) recruitment due to alleged irregularities, upholding the decision to initiate a criminal investigation.
Ritu Kapila v. Saroj & Anr
Appeals against orders passed by a single Judge under Section 24 of the CPC are not maintainable before a Division Bench under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966, as such orders do not fall within the scope of ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Tribeni Mahanti v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a dowry death case under Sections 304-B/34 IPC, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation and non-interference with the investigation.
Represented by: v. THE STATE & ANR Represented by:
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications as premature due to non-registration of FIR but allowed petitioners liberty to seek remedy after FIR registration.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Interlink Services P.Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed two income tax appeals as not pressed following a Central Board of Direct Taxes notification permitting withdrawal.
Neeraj & Ors v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from landlord-tenant disputes following a voluntary settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Puran Chand v. The Management of M/S Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the dismissal of a conductor by holding that the management failed to prove misconduct with credible independent evidence, emphasizing the correct burden and standard of proof in departmental proceedings.
Abid Ali v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the marital life of an adult inter-caste couple must be protected from familial harassment, dismissing the father's writ petition alleging kidnapping and emphasizing protection of the newlyweds.
Nilanjan Gupta v. State and Another
The Delhi High Court recognized respondent No.2 as the lawful Hindu wife of the deceased, granted her equal share in the estate, and penalized the petitioner for raising false claims denying the marriage.
Praveen v. State
The Delhi High Court granted parole to petitioners to attend their nephew's marriage on humanitarian grounds, subject to bonds and without affecting co-convicts' release.