Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Rajbir Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF Sub-Inspectors are entitled to pay fixation at Rs. 10,230/- plus grade pay of Rs. 4,200/- under the ACP Scheme applying the 1.86 multiplier, overruling fixation at the minimum pay band.
Union of India v. Raj Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to comply with the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench ruling in Jarnail Singh, which modified the legal requirements for reservation policies previously laid down in M. Nagaraj.
Jyoti Kushwaha and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Jyoti Kushwaha and others as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request.
Laxmi & Anr. v. New Delhi Institute of Management & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that termination of workmen without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, affirmed compensation in lieu of reinstatement due to long delay, and clarified the burden of proof and relief principles in wrongful termination cases.
Vikram Chandhok v. Rashmi Skadegaard
The Delhi High Court held that when a witness is recalled to produce an original document, the opposing party has the right to cross-examine on all aspects including authenticity, not just custody and possession.
Jitender Alias Jitu & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a minor neighborhood dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC while emphasizing caution in serious offences.
Jyotikumar & Anr v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court directed street vendors to approach the Town Vending Committee for regularization of vending rights, emphasizing procedural fairness without deciding on substantive claims.
Harender Verma and Praveen Verma v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a case of alleged assault causing grievous injury, considering voluntary cooperation and nature of injuries.
Sh. Brim Singh @ Brim Sain v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating under Section 420 IPC, subject to deposit of restitution amount and conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation and non-interference with witnesses.
M/S UNISON AIRCONDITIONER & ANR v. M/S CREONS ADVERTISING PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of contractors who failed to perform work after receiving advance payment, upholding the trial court's decree for recovery and rejecting their counterclaim for unpaid dues.
Shekhar Pillai v. Ashok Khetrapal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal, upholding the trial court's decree for possession and mesne profits based on an admitted registered Lease Deed and rejecting ownership claims lacking a registered Gift Deed.
Praveen Bansal & Ors. v. Shyam Lal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of a suit as barred by limitation but allowed the plaintiffs to file a fresh suit based on illegal dispossession without seeking declaration or cancellation of the Agreement to Sell.
Sominder Singh Rawat & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 498A IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Shakuntala Devi v. Vinod K Dayal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a daughter-in-law held property in fiduciary capacity for her mother-in-law under the Benami Transactions Act, declaring the mother-in-law the beneficial owner and dismissing the son's claim.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. M/S Gupta Construction Co. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award granting loss of profits due to lack of proof of actual loss, while upholding damages for delay and other claims, emphasizing that loss of profits cannot be awarded without demonstrable injury and to avoid double recovery.
Christian Louboutin SAS v. Nakul Bajaj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an e-commerce platform actively promoting and selling infringing products cannot claim safe harbour protection under Section 79 of the IT Act and granted injunctions in favor of the trademark owner.
Shashi Garg v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against addition of unexplained cash deposits to taxable income under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, upholding the factual findings of the tax authorities.
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5 v. Jagson International Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 8D for disallowance under Section 14A is not mandatory without Assessing Officer's satisfaction and deferred the drilling rig classification issue pending Supreme Court ruling.
Jitendra Kumar Pandey v. Chief General Manager, State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the rejection of a writ petition challenging delay-barred promotion-related grievances, holding that successive breaches do not constitute a continuous cause of action under Section 22 of the Limitation Act.
Ranjan Dagar & Anr. v. Omaxe Ltd
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement between parties in a lease rent dispute involving payment terms, area measurement, and possession, disposing of the petition accordingly.