Full Text
Translation output
$- 1 to 7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN.2551/2018
KRISHAN LAL BANSAL
Represented by:
BAIL APPLN.2551/2018
KRISHAN LAL BANSAL
Represented by:
VERSUS
THE STATE & ANR Represented by:
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with
SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with
SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
BAIL APPLN.2560/2018
CHANDERBHAN BANSAL Petitioner Represented by: Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
CHANDERBHAN BANSAL Petitioner Represented by: Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
VERSUS
THESTATE
(GOVTOFNCT OFDELHI) Respondent Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with
SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
(GOVTOFNCT OFDELHI) Respondent Represented by: Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with
SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
BAIL APPLN.2563/2018
NEELAM BANSAL
Represented-by:
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
NEELAM BANSAL
Represented-by:
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
VERSUS
THE STATE
BAIL APPLN.2551/2018and conn,matters Respondent page10/4
2018:DHC:8466 Represented by:
BAIL APPLN.2551/2018and conn,matters Respondent page10/4
2018:DHC:8466 Represented by:
BAIL APPLN.2564/2018
SURESH KUMAR BANSAL
Represented by:
SURESH KUMAR BANSAL
Represented by:
VERSUS
Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate THE STATE & ANR
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate THE STATE & ANR
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
BAIL APPLN.2566/2018
VIVEK BANSAL
Represented by:
VIVEK BANSAL
Represented by:
VERSUS
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate THE STATE & ANR
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
BAIL APPLN.2568/2018
APAAR BANSAL
BAIL APPLN.2551/2018and connt, matters Petitioner page2of4
2018:DHC:8466 Vl Represented by: Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
APAAR BANSAL
BAIL APPLN.2551/2018and connt, matters Petitioner page2of4
2018:DHC:8466 Vl Represented by: Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
VERSUS
THE STATE & ANR Represented by:
BAIL APPLN.2569/2018
GARIMA BANSAL
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
GARIMA BANSAL
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Petitioner Mr.R.D.Singh,Advocate
VERSUS
THE STATE
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
Represented by:
Respondent Ms.Meenakshi Chauhan,APP with SI Jitender,PS KNK Marg and ASI
Jagbir Singh,CAW Cell.
Mr.Sumit Choudhary and Ms. Aakanksha Bansal,Advocates for R-
2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
12.11.2018 Crl.M.A.No.35233/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2551/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35282/2018(ExemptionJ in BAIT.APPLN.2560/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35297/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2563/2018
Crl.M.A.No.35298/2018(ExemptionJ in BAIT.APPLN.2564/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35305/2018(Exemption^ in BAH.APPLN.2566/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35310/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2568/2018
Crl.M.A.No.35311/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2569/2018
Allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions.
BAILAPPLN.2551/2018andconn,matters page3 of4 2018:DHC:8466 i
12.11.2018 Crl.M.A.No.35233/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2551/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35282/2018(ExemptionJ in BAIT.APPLN.2560/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35297/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2563/2018
Crl.M.A.No.35298/2018(ExemptionJ in BAIT.APPLN.2564/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35305/2018(Exemption^ in BAH.APPLN.2566/2018
CrI.M.A.No.35310/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2568/2018
Crl.M.A.No.35311/2018(Exemption^ in BAIL APPLN.2569/2018
Allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions.
BAILAPPLN.2551/2018andconn,matters page3 of4 2018:DHC:8466 i
BAIL APPLN. 2551/2018, BAIL APPLN. 2560/2018. BAIL APPT N.
2563/2018, BAIL APPLN.2564/2018. BAIL APPLN.2566/2018. BAIT.
2563/2018, BAIL APPLN.2564/2018. BAIL APPLN.2566/2018. BAIT.
APPLN.2568/2018 and BAIL APPLN.2569/2018
By the impugned order the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners were dismissed as premature for the reason no FIR was registered.
Learned APP for the State submits that FIR has now been registered on 7^*^ November,2018.
Learned counsel forthe petitioners would be atliberty to take remedy beforethe learned Additional Sessions Judge.
Petitions are dismissed with liberty as noted above.
NOVEMBER 12,2018 MUKTA GUPTA,J.
'yo' BAILAPPLN.2551/2018andconn,matters page4 of4
2018:DHC:8466
By the impugned order the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners were dismissed as premature for the reason no FIR was registered.
Learned APP for the State submits that FIR has now been registered on 7^*^ November,2018.
Learned counsel forthe petitioners would be atliberty to take remedy beforethe learned Additional Sessions Judge.
Petitions are dismissed with liberty as noted above.
NOVEMBER 12,2018 MUKTA GUPTA,J.
'yo' BAILAPPLN.2551/2018andconn,matters page4 of4
2018:DHC:8466
JUDGMENT