Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Devesh Bhargava v. HLL Lifecare Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the decree holder to withdraw the execution petition while preserving the judgment debtors' right to raise jurisdictional objections in appropriate proceedings.
Shanta Trehan & Anr. v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration for a duly registered and uncontested Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, confirming the petitioners as rightful beneficiaries.
Ranjan Dagar & Anr. v. Omaxe Ltd
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement between parties in a lease rent dispute involving payment terms, area measurement, and possession, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
National Highways Authority of India v. Shillong Expressway Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding the petitioner liable for delay due to late handing over of additional land and dismissed the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S IND SYNERGY LTD v. M/S D S GLOBAL PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court directed the executing court to dispose of pending applications in execution proceedings expeditiously under its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Managing Committee Jan Kalyan Primary School v. Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s applications for restoration of a suit dismissed in default and condonation of delay, holding that no sufficient grounds were made out and the suit was not maintainable on the face of the plaint.
MYNA HOMES PVT LTD v. UNION BANK OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act for appeals filed by attorneys of borrowers, dismissing a third party's plea to avoid such deposit.
Babli Sonu v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the acquittal under Section 302 IPC, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.
Narendra Kumar Aggarwal v. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that pension rights of NTPC employees crystallize on retirement date and writ petitions challenging pension reductions are maintainable against NTPC and its Pension Trust, allowing appeals of pre-2003 retirees and restoring others for merits adjudication.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. RAJ KUMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing fixation of seniority of ad-hoc promoted teachers from their initial promotion dates, rejecting the government's challenge to count seniority only from regularization dates.
Pranay Dubey v. Meena Kumari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring the suit on payment of enhanced costs to correct respondents, emphasizing strict compliance with court orders and denying further indulgence due to appellants' repeated delays.
M/S Hope Life Sciences & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed criminal revision petitions as infructuous following the petitioners' request for withdrawal.
Dinesh Kapoor v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 420 and 34 IPC, conditioned on cooperation with investigation and deposit of disputed amount as fixed deposits.
Pankaj Balotia v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused of cruelty and dowry harassment following the deceased's suicide, considering the absence of dowry allegations in the FIR and delay in complaint filing.
Bharat Sharma v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused of sexual assault after investigation completion and charge sheet filing, noting inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's statements and cooperation by the accused.
Suresh Malhotra v. R K Malhotra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to challenge a Will, Gift Deed, and Conveyance Deed, emphasizing that the merits of the amendment are not to be examined at the stage of allowing it under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC.
Amrit Jal Ventures Private Limited v. IFCI Venture Capital Fund Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to include reliefs against the illegal sale of pledged shares, emphasizing that amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC should be allowed in the interest of justice without examining merits at the amendment stage.
Ajay Sharma & Anr. v. Manu Markande & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld amendments to pleadings concerning a family agreement and Will in a succession dispute, while rejecting amendments based on limitation pleas, emphasizing that amendments should facilitate real controversy adjudication and not be denied for counsel negligence.
Ajay Sharma & Anr v. Manu Markande & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld partial allowance of amendments to pleadings concerning a family agreement and Will in succession proceedings, dismissing limitation pleas and emphasizing that amendments necessary for real controversy determination should be allowed.
Shoppers Stop Ltd v. Softobell Inc. & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against defendants for infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark "VETTORIO FRATINI" by using the deceptively similar mark "VETTERN FRATTINI", relying on verified plaint and ex parte proceedings.