Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Himanshu Kumar Verma and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the government's cadre allocation policy for IAS and IPS officers selected in CSE 2017, ruling that the allocation process, including treatment of limited preference candidates, was lawful and not arbitrary.
PCLIT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. MTECH Solutions
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award directing refund of a security deposit, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court refused to grant interim reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act during ongoing arbitration, emphasizing deference to the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order balancing equities.
Union of India & Ors. v. Manoj Joshi
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing promotion consideration for employees possessing higher qualifications equivalent to prescribed essential qualifications under statutory rules.
Ashvika Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Gujarat & Anr.
The Delhi High Court ordered release of the deposited decretal amount to the decree holder and closed the enforcement petition upon satisfaction of the decree.
Tara Chand Goel v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The petitioner withdrew the criminal petitions before the Delhi High Court, which were dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications.
Akram Ali v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 377, 232, and 506 IPC on the ground of settlement and cleared misunderstanding, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC as per Supreme Court guidelines.
Kishan Anand & Anr v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs registered under various IPC sections on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent oppression and prejudice.
Kishan Anand & Anr v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to quash cross FIRs registered due to a resolved misunderstanding between neighbors, applying Section 482 CrPC to prevent oppressive criminal proceedings.
Shaukeen Chaoudhary v. The Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement in a matrimonial dispute, applying inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Lokesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Harvinder Singh Tokas v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving commercial offences under IPC Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, and 120-B on the ground that the parties settled their dispute, applying the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Anil Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of an FIR under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties under its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Bank One Limited v. Directorate General of Civil Aviation and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed DGCA to cancel the aircraft registration upon expiry of the lease and accept the petitioner's documents for deregistration, affirming the mandatory nature of deregistration under the Aircraft Rules and CAR.
Ashutosh Rathi v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused under Section 406 IPC, considering delay in complaint and compliance with investigation without commenting on the merits.
Amarjeet v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 304B/498A/34 IPC, finding insufficient evidence of dowry demand and harassment and considering the ongoing financial support to the deceased's mother.
Rajeev Katyal v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of forgery and cheating, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation and non-interference with prosecution.
Rohit Chaturvedi v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of sexual assault and extortion, considering the delay in complaint and DNA evidence, while imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.
Karans Gurukul Classes & Ors. v. Gurukul Classes IIT Division & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the trademark infringement suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction as the cause of action arose where the plaintiffs’ licensees and defendants carried on business, not at the plaintiffs’ principal office in Delhi.
Naresh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to reform the Paralympics Committee of India's functioning and support system following allegations of mismanagement and harassment affecting para-athletes at the 2012 Paralympics.