Delhi High Court

49,110 judgments

Year:

GOYAL MG GASES PRIVATE LIMITED v. PANAMA IINFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS.

05 Jul 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:3218

The Delhi High Court held that an order dismissing an application for impleadment of third parties in arbitration is not an interim award and is not challengeable under Section 34, dismissing the petition on maintainability and merits.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Interim arbitral award Impleadment of third parties

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S BHAGHEERATHA ENGINEERING LIMITED

05 Jul 2019 · S. Muralidhar; Talwant Singh · 2019:DHC:3219-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's appeal, upholding the arbitral award that claims were not time barred despite delayed invocation of dispute resolution, and confirming the apportionment of delay and partial allowance of additional cost claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Dispute Review Expert procedure Limitation period Section 28 Indian Contract Act

M/S UEM INDIA LTD v. SUNIL KUMAR RAJAN

05 Jul 2019 · Prateek Jalan · 2019:DHC:3220

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing amendment of the plaint in an employee dues recovery suit, emphasizing that amendments not altering the suit's fundamental nature are permissible and awarding enhanced costs to compensate the defendant.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC Article 227 Constitution limitation

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Resham Singh & Anr.

05 Jul 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:3214

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal, setting aside compensation awarded to a claimant driver due to lack of credible proof of accident, employment, and permanent disability.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act permanent disability employment proof insurance liability

M/S Themis Medicare Limited v. Union of India

05 Jul 2019 · Vibhu Bahru · 2019:DHC:3215

The Delhi High Court upheld the regulatory authorities' decision to cancel manufacturing licenses for a drug containing Transcutol P, affirming expert committee findings of insufficient safety evidence for its parenteral use and emphasizing the need for prior new drug approval.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Transcutol P parenteral formulations Drugs and Cosmetics Rules new drug approval

Santokh Singh v. State

05 Jul 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:3212

Interim bail was granted to the petitioner under NDPS Act on medical grounds for urgent surgery, subject to conditions safeguarding the trial process.

criminal petition_allowed interim bail medical grounds NDPS Act urgent surgery

Rahul Gupta v. State

05 Jul 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:3213

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case due to lack of material evidence beyond a retracted co-accused statement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant regular bail NDPS Act confessional statement co-accused statement

M/S Themis Medicare Limited v. Union of India

05 Jul 2019 · Vibhu Bahru · 2019:DHC:3211

The Delhi High Court upheld regulatory authorities' decision to cancel licenses for manufacturing Diclofenac Sodium Injection containing Transcutol P, affirming the need for adequate safety evidence and regulatory approval of excipients in parenteral drugs.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Transcutol P parenteral formulations Drug Regulatory Authority Expert Committee

Balbir Sher Gill v. State of Delhi & Ors.

05 Jul 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:3232

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for probate of a disputed Will due to lack of credible proof and suspicious circumstances, directing prosecution for forgery under Section 340 CrPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant probate Will Indian Succession Act Section 63

SHININGKART ECOMMERCE PVT LTD. v. JIAYUN DATA LIMITED

05 Jul 2019 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2019:DHC:3228

The Delhi High Court upheld interim orders passed by the arbitral tribunal treating pleadings as an application under Section 17, rejecting the appellant's challenge based on procedural grounds and acquiescence.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition Section 17 application Interim order

Pravesh Sharma & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

05 Jul 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:3226

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 324, 452, and 34 IPC on settlement between parties and exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC inherent jurisdiction settlement

Nitin Sharma & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Jul 2019 · Sunil Gaur · 2019:DHC:3227

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC on settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Amit Ranjan v. Narcotic Control Bureau, Delhi

05 Jul 2019 · Chander Shekhar · 2019:DHC:3225
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner involved in a narcotics conspiracy involving commercial quantities, as custodial interrogation and strict compliance with Section 37 of the NDPS Act were necessary.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail NDPS Act commercial quantity Section 37 NDPS Act

Gorkha Security Services v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr

05 Jul 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:3224-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging ambiguity in tender conditions for security services, holding no prejudice was caused to the petitioner who quoted rates as per competent authority approval.

administrative petition_dismissed tender process ambiguity in tender minimum wages Delhi Development Authority

Nabinagar Power Generating Company Limited v. AMR India Limited

05 Jul 2019 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:3222
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, affirming limited judicial interference with arbitral findings on delay, breach, and limitation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Arbitral award Contract termination

Jasbir Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Jul 2019 · Mukta Gupta · 2019:DHC:7315

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in two FIRs involving forgery and cheating, considering prolonged custody and completion of investigation with conditions to ensure compliance.

criminal appeal_allowed bail forgery trespass cheating

KjRISHNA DEVI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

04 Jul 2019 · Chander Shekhar · 2019:DHC:7298

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of two arrested petitioners in default due to their non-appearance and lack of interest in pursuing the petitions.

criminal petition_dismissed bail application arrest non-appearance dismissal in default

Chandan Singh v. Prasar Bharti and Anr.

04 Jul 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:3204

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment on the basis of denied compensatory time, holding that despite procedural violations, the petitioner’s adjusted marks did not meet merit criteria and the Chief Commissioner’s recommendation was not binding.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compensatory time persons with disabilities disability discrimination Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities

RTDC LIMITED v. M/S LUXURY TRAINS PVT LTD & ORS

04 Jul 2019 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2019:DHC:3207

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery of dues evidenced by dishonored cheques, holding that directors are not personally liable under Order XXXVII CPC absent statutory provision and passing decree against the company and liable directors.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit negotiable instruments dishonored cheque

Kishan Chand Verma v. State Thr. C.B.I.; Pawan Kumar Sharma v. State Thr. C.B.I.

04 Jul 2019 · R.K. Gauba · 2019:DHC:3209

The Delhi High Court acquitted two DDA Junior Engineers of corruption charges due to serious contradictions in prosecution evidence and adverse credibility findings against the complainant, emphasizing the need for proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act illegal gratification benefit of doubt credibility of complainant