Delhi High Court
49,371 judgments
Kishan Chand Verma v. State Thr. C.B.I.; Pawan Kumar Sharma v. State Thr. C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court acquitted two DDA Junior Engineers of corruption charges due to serious doubts on prosecution evidence and adverse credibility findings against the complainant.
The Vishwa Nath & Santosh Bakshi Charitable Educational Trust v. Defendant
The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under Section 7(1) of the Charitable & Religious Trusts Act are by petition, not suit, and granted permission with directions for sale of trust property below circle rate under Court supervision.
Namita Sharma & Anr. v. Jag Mohan Ahuja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restrained Defendant No.1 from alienating his share in the Naraina Vihar property, recognizing his prima facie ownership under a perpetual lease and conveyance deed, while allowing leasing but protecting Plaintiffs' rights pending suit.
M/S EUROKEM LABORATORIES LTD. AND ANR. v. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission's amendment mandating a dissolution test for Albendazole Tablets without granting a deferment period, emphasizing manufacturers' duty to comply with updated drug standards in public interest.
Paavani Gupta v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking independent re-evaluation of CBSE Class 12 answer sheets, holding that courts should not interfere with academic evaluations once re-evaluation is conducted unless a material error is clearly demonstrated.
M/S EUROKEM LABORATORIES LTD. AND ANR. v. MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission's amendment mandating dissolution testing for Albendazole Tablets without granting a deferment period, emphasizing manufacturers' duty to comply with international drug standards in the interest of public health.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co Ltd v. Jarina Begum & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that death caused by work-related stress during employment constitutes an accident entitling legal heirs to compensation, dismissing the insurer's appeal.
Minor X v. State
The Delhi High Court held that slight or partial penetration suffices for framing charges under Section 6 POCSO and directed the Trial Court to frame appropriate charges accordingly, setting aside the order framing charge only under Section 10 POCSO.
Sanjay Mahalwal v. State of NCT of Delhi
Interim bail was granted on humanitarian grounds to the petitioner due to the critical illness of his grandfather, subject to strict conditions to protect the trial.
Suresh Yadav v. State and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's order recalling the victim for further cross examination under Section 311 CrPC, holding that repeated opportunities had been granted and recalling the witness would cause undue harassment without sufficient justification.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity and related offences based on eyewitness identification, recoveries at accused's instance, and corroborative evidence despite minor procedural lapses.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity and possession of stolen property based on credible eyewitness identification, recoveries, and disclosure statements despite minor procedural lapses.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity and related offences based on credible eyewitness identification, lawful recoveries, and corroborative evidence despite minor procedural irregularities.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity and possession of stolen property based on reliable eyewitness identification, recoveries at accused's instance, and consistent prosecution evidence despite minor procedural lapses.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity and possession of stolen property based on credible eyewitness identification, lawful recoveries, and reliable disclosure statements despite minor procedural lapses.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions and sentences of multiple accused for dacoity and related offences, affirming the sufficiency of identification and recovery evidence despite minor procedural lapses.
Raj Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions for dacoity and related offences based on credible eyewitness identification, lawful recoveries, and ownership proof despite procedural lapses.
Mohd. Chand v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant of rape and criminal intimidation charges due to contradictions in prosecution evidence, unexplained delay in FIR, and failure to prove victim's age.
Sunil Yadav & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, 506, 498A, and 34 IPC on the ground of settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.
Hare Ram Singh v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288, 337, and 304A IPC on the basis of accidental deaths and settlement between parties, exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.