Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
Mr. Jitender Mehta, Mr. Lalit Kumar, Mr. Abhinav Kumar and Mr. Mohit Garg v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's request for a limited extension of the catering contract as a representation with an opportunity of hearing, denying automatic parity with static units and disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
P. K. Techno Projects Pvt Ltd v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's pending appeal against temporary delisting within two weeks, emphasizing natural justice and reasonableness, and dismissed the writ petition without expressing opinion on merits.
Madhuri Refiners Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Omshree Agro Tech Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of an interlocutory appeal with clarifications ensuring the trial court remains uninfluenced by the impugned order and liberty to seek remedies against the final suit decision.
Dhingra Brothers v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Dhingra Brothers v. Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Ritu Mishra & Ors. v. Chandi Prasad Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to frame additional issues and delete parties in a recovery suit, holding no interference was warranted at the advanced trial stage.
Sanjeev Kumar v. Aakash Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to admit a delayed written statement as the suit had already been decreed, rendering the petition infructuous.
Mohd Shakeel & Ors. v. Mohd Islam
The court held that execution must proceed only on the modified decree and allowed withdrawal of the earlier execution petition, dismissing the challenge to the dismissal of objections therein.
Meenakshi Sharma v. Ranveer Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a written statement filed within the 120-day outer limit cannot be taken off record solely for lack of condonation application and directed it to be taken on record subject to costs.
Ram Mulakh Darbar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions for expeditious disposal of a decade-old civil suit against a non-party respondent but directed the Trial Court to dispose of the suit promptly.
LT COL DR YASMIN YUSUFZAI RETD v. MR AWES RAJPUT & ORS.
The Delhi High Court declared sale deeds executed by impersonation and forgery as illegal and void, upheld the Plaintiff's ownership, cancelled the forged deeds, and granted possession recovery with interim relief to bona fide purchasers.
Jai Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 448, 511, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Suraj v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.
X v. State (NCTD) and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a father for aggravated sexual assault of his minor daughter under the POCSO Act, affirming that forensic evidence and foundational facts can sustain conviction despite hostile witnesses.
Siddharth Garg v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Maa Sharda Vidyapeeth v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court quashed the withdrawal of recognition by NCTE due to failure to issue a proper show cause notice disclosing forgery allegations, restoring recognition for one unit pending fresh proceedings.
State v. Vinod Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape case, affirming the trial court's finding of reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in evidence and emphasizing the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.
Rajender Kumar Pahuja v. Anup Narain Gaur
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement ground, rejecting challenges to the site plan and availability of alternate accommodation under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Mohit Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a fresh medical examination due to inadequacies in the earlier medical boards' assessments lacking orthopedic expertise and clinical tests.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Shakuntla Joshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed CBI's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal of public officials accused of criminal conspiracy and corruption in the revival of a cooperative society, holding absence of corrupt intent and insufficient evidence.