Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Paramjit Singh Nanda v. Chief Manager, Punjab and Sind Bank

25 Aug 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:7311-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a delayed appeal challenging compulsory retirement, holding that the 902-day delay was not sufficiently explained and thus the delay could not be condoned under the Limitation Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation period Section 5 Limitation Act sufficient cause

M/S Rachna Global Excavation Ltd and Anr v. M/S Jindal Steel and Power Limited

25 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7410

The High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall a witness for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that such discretion must be exercised sparingly and not to prolong trial proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall of witness cross-examination discretionary power

Sh. Amit Wadhwa & Ors. v. State (Govt, of NCT) of Delhi & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7295

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Anand Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7296

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Jatin Kapoor & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7305

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Jaswinder Singh v. Manpreetkaur

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7316

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the petitioner's injunction application while ensuring due hearing, without commenting on its merits.

civil other permanent injunction expeditious disposal interlocutory application trial court

Nadeem Khan v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)

25 Aug 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:7287

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of fabricating forged documents and misrepresenting facts, as custodial interrogation was necessary for effective investigation in a land dispute case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC forgery fabrication of documents

Ramanand Sahni v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

25 Aug 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1267
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the third bail application of a 70-year-old accused in a child sexual assault case, holding that credible victim testimony and the gravity of the offence outweigh inconsistencies and absence of forensic evidence at the bail stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail sexual assault child victim POCSO Act

Sanwar Agarwal v. Dora Medical Trading (India) Pvt. Ltd

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7324

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's discretion to fix the seat and venue of arbitration in Delhi, dismissing the petition for judicial interference absent bad faith or perversity.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral tribunal discretion Seat of arbitration Venue of arbitration Section 20 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Samyak Jain v. Superintendent (Adjudication), Central GST Delhi & Ors.

25 Aug 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7391-DB

The Delhi High Court directed police investigation into alleged misuse of the petitioner’s GST registration number and allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a large GST demand.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration misuse Input Tax Credit fraud Economic Offences Wing investigation Section 107 CGST Act appeal

Amir v. State NCT of Delhi

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' conviction for robbery causing injury but modified their sentence to the period already served, considering the evidence and their conduct.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed conviction robbery injury identification

Ashok v. State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7363

The High Court acquitted the appellant of rape and cheating charges, holding that prolonged consensual sexual relations and lack of proof of false promise of marriage vitiating consent negated the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent false promise of marriage rape Section 376 IPC

Rama Luthra v. Deepali Malik

25 Aug 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:7376
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted conditional leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery of loan amounts from legal representatives of a deceased borrower, emphasizing the necessity of triable issues and balancing expeditious disposal with fair trial rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit legal representatives liability

Amit Kumar Singhal v. Sharad Kumar Gupta

25 Aug 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:7364

The High Court held that an interlocutory order dismissing a miscellaneous application under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act is not amenable to revision under Section 115 CPC and dismissed the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory order miscellaneous application

Braham Singh and Anr v. Rambir @ Ramvir Singh and Ors

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7365

The High Court upheld the Probate Court's order permitting examination of attesting witnesses before the propounder in a probate proceeding, dismissing the petition challenging the procedural sequence.

civil petition_dismissed Probate Petition Will Attesting Witnesses Examination of Witnesses

Sanjay Kalia & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7366

The Delhi High Court allowed belated filing of additional documents in a long-pending land acquisition compensation reference petition subject to costs and limited opportunity to summon witnesses.

civil appeal_allowed Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18 Order VII Rule 14 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India

Sh. Girish Kapoor and Anr v. Sh. Roop Kishore Rastogi and Ors

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7370

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's correction of a typographical error in an eviction order under Section 152 CPC without notice, dismissing the tenants' petition challenging the rectification.

civil petition_dismissed Section 152 CPC typographical error rectification Delhi Rent Control Act

Jai Prakash Sharma v. M/S National Marwari Foundation & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7368

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an execution petition for lack of hearing and directed the Executing Court to reconsider the matter after giving the decree holder a fair opportunity to be heard.

civil appeal_allowed Significant execution petition decree holder opportunity of hearing dismissal of execution petition

Raj Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Aug 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:7320

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and risk of tampering with evidence despite completion of investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC murder judicial custody

Central Bank of India v. M/S. Vardhman Foods & Anr.

25 Aug 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7369

The High Court set aside the trial court's broad directions unrelated to the recovery suit and directed the petitioner bank to file an appropriate application for substituted service at the alternate address found.

civil appeal_allowed recovery suit substituted service alternate address loan default