Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Dr Poornima Advani & Anr v. Govt of NCT & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal seeking interest on refunded e-stamp value as the issue was not raised earlier, confirming refund of the principal amount only.
Union of India v. Deep Chand Sharma and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing retrospective regularization of ad hoc promotions and seniority reckoning from vacancy dates for promotees delayed by administrative lapses in holding DPCs.
Sunil Bhalla & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Sanjiv K Singh & Ors. v. Ritu Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that property purchased from ancestral sale proceeds is self-acquired, not HUF property, and set aside a family settlement induced by misrepresentation, decreeing equal partition among legal heirs under the Hindu Succession Act.
Poonam Garg v. IFCI Venture Capital Funds Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that an employee can withdraw a voluntary retirement notice before its effective date unless barred by specific provisions, and quashed the employer's arbitrary rejection of such withdrawal.
INTERTEK INDIA PVT LTD v. PRIYANKA MOHAN
The High Court held that a suit for declaration of illegal termination and damages is maintainable even without seeking reinstatement, and the plaint cannot be partially rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.
HCL Infotech Limited v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator despite respondent's procedural objection to notice address, holding that notice served on authorized representative with copy to appropriate authority suffices.
Ram Chander v. Virender Kuamr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction after the parties settled their dispute and the tenant handed over vacant possession.
M/S AJAY AUTO SPARES v. VIRENDER KUAMR
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of an eviction revision petition following settlement and stayed eviction execution until the tenant vacates the premises by a specified date under binding undertaking.
Jagdish Prasad & Son v. Krishan Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction as withdrawn on an undertaking to vacate by a fixed date and stay of eviction execution until then.
Union of India v. M/S JCB India Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a belated petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that limitation cannot be extended beyond 120 days even after return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.
Sanjeev Gupta v. Satish Kumar Aggarwal & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn after the tenant settled the eviction dispute and vacated the premises under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Santosh Pandey v. Virender Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act following settlement and handing over of vacant possession by the tenant.
Vishwanath v. Gurmeet Singh & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed leave to defend in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that subsequent events raising triable issues must be considered before rejecting defense.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. V. D. Pandey
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order holding that an employee who did not specifically opt for the CPF Scheme is deemed covered under the GPF-cum-Pension Scheme.
Dr. Artiben R Thakkar v. Delhi Pharmaceuticals Science & Research University & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that maternity benefits under the Maternity Benefits Act are available only during the subsistence of contractual employment and do not extend beyond contract expiry.
Hari Kishan Dhoot & Anr v. Satish Kumar Aggarwal & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the eviction petition as withdrawn after the parties settled the dispute through mediation and the petitioners handed over possession.
Jagdish Chander v. Amarjeet Kaur
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the eviction revision petition on undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.
M/S TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD. v. M/S RAJAT ELECTRICALS
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition under Section 27 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to summon a witness and produce documents for arbitration, dispensing with notice to the respondent due to prior no objection.
Rajesh Mehta v. Jawahar Hans
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction on tenant's undertaking to vacate premises and pay use and occupation charges, staying eviction execution till specified date.