Hari Kishan Dhoot & Anr v. Satish Kumar Aggarwal & Anr

Delhi High Court · 27 Sep 2019 · 2019:DHC:4970
Sanjeev Sachdeva
RC.REV. 364/2018
2019:DHC:4970
civil petition_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the eviction petition as withdrawn after the parties settled the dispute through mediation and the petitioners handed over possession.

Full Text
Translation output
RC.REV. 364/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 27.09.2019
RC.REV. 364/2018 & CM APPL.30537/2018
HARI KISHAN DHOOT & ANR ..... Petitioners
versus
SATISH KUMAR AGGARWAL & ANR ..... Respondents
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Mr.B.Venkataraman, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr.Puneet Mahajan, Advocate.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 24.04.2018, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Property No.213, First Floor, Gali Batasan, Chawri Bazar, Delhi-110006, Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan 2019:DHC:4970 RC.REV. 364/2018 annexed with the eviction petition.

3. Parties were referred to mediation.

4. Learned counsels for the parties inform that the mediation was successful and consequent to the settlement, the petitioner has handed over peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent.

5. Learned counsel for the parties inform that all disputes between the parties stand settled and now nothing is surviving against each other.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

7. The Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

8. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 rk