Jagdish Chander v. Amarjeet Kaur

Delhi High Court · 27 Sep 2019 · 2019:DHC:4969
Sanjeev Sachdeva
RC.REV. 387/2015
2019:DHC:4969
property appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the eviction revision petition on undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
RC.REV. 387/2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 27.09.2019
RC.REV. 387/2015
JAGDISH CHANDER ..... Petitioner
versus
AMARJEET KAUR ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Mr.V.P.Katiyar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Jatan Singh and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner impugns order dated 27.05.2015, whereby, leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner, on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from Property No.159/113, Tri Nagar, Delhi, more particularly shown in green colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition. 2019:DHC:4969

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the petitioner who appears in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4. Petitioner who is present in Court in person, undertakes that he shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 30.12.2020. Petitioner further undertakes that he shall pay Rs. 5000/- per month as use and occupation charges with effect from 01.10.2019 till the time he hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 30.12.2020.

5. Petitioner further undertakes that the petitioner shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before the petitioner vacates the premises. Petitioner further undertakes that the petitioner shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof. Petitioner further undertakes that the petitioner shall not cause any damage to the property and shall hand over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent in a condition as existing today, subject to normal wear and tear.

6. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that the undertaking is acceptable to the respondent.

7. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

8. On petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking, within a period of two weeks in the above terms, execution of the impugned order dated 27.05.2015 shall remain stayed till 30.12.2020.

9. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2019