Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Shri Jaipal Chand Jain v. Shri Manoj Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend applications and decreed two suits for recovery of loans advanced through RTGS and promissory notes, affirming territorial jurisdiction and rejecting sham defences.
Asha Rathore v. Commissioner of Police & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the school certificate is the conclusive document for determining a juvenile's age under the Juvenile Justice Act, dismissing the petition claiming the juvenile was a minor.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Synergy Steels Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the arbitrator's award that the explosion damage was covered under the fire policy and the exclusion clause was inapplicable or not relied upon.
Rashid v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a driver for rash and negligent driving causing death and injuries under Sections 279, 337, and 304A IPC, dismissing the criminal revision petition.
Rinku @ Ram Prasad v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault on a minor, affirming the reliability of the child victim's testimony despite variations in statements.
M/S PSYCHOTROPICS INDIA LTD. v. M/S SYNCOM HEALTHCARE LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed appointment of Local Commissioners in execution proceedings to seize infringing pharmaceutical goods and enforce a permanent injunction in a trademark infringement suit.
Rajab Ali Khan v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application holding that the charge-sheet was filed within the statutory 90-day period from the date of arrest/remand and was complete, thus no default bail under Section 167(2)(a)(i) CrPC was warranted.
All India Association of Central Excise Gazetted Executive Officers v. The Chairman, Central Board of Excise and Customs
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by an association challenging a CAT order granting relief solely to an individual applicant, holding that the association lacked locus without a general direction or collective grievance.
Sudhir Bala Sarine v. Baccha Thakur
The Delhi High Court held that a licensee or caretaker cannot claim ownership or adverse possession rights against the registered owner and granted possession and permanent injunction in favor of the plaintiff.
Ramesh Sharma & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's refusal to continue prosecution.
Jaikaran & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.
M/S Dhingra Auto Store v. Rohit Vedi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, as withdrawn, thereby upholding the eviction order and possession transfer.
M/S Venus Auto Products of India v. Rohit Vedi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction as withdrawn after possession was taken over by the landlord and the tenant sought to withdraw the challenge.
Sudhir Kumar Aggarwal v. Rohit Vedi
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in an eviction case under the Delhi Rent Control Act, stayed execution of the eviction order, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date.
Kunal Auto Industries v. Rohit Vedi
The Delhi High Court accepted a settlement between landlord and tenant in an eviction case under the Delhi Rent Control Act, stayed the eviction order, and dismissed the petition as withdrawn on agreed terms.
MYLAN LABORATORIES LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that rejection of a pre-grant opposition by the Deputy Controller is not amenable to writ jurisdiction when efficacious statutory remedies like post-grant opposition and revocation exist, and directed the petitioner to avail those remedies.
Sanjeev Singh Ahluwalia v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of an IAS officer's voluntary retirement application due to prolonged unauthorized absence and contemplated disciplinary action, emphasizing that such retirement applications require acceptance by competent authority when disciplinary proceedings are involved.
Hriday Kumar Chaturvedi v. Master Daksh
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's application to reject the plaint for partition of self-acquired Delhi properties and held that suits for ancestral properties outside Delhi are not maintainable in Delhi courts.
Raj Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's unwillingness to prosecute further.
Mr.Saurabh Kirpal, Mr.Pankaj Yadav, Ms. Varsha Yadav and Mr. Priyaranjan Dubey, Advocates. v. DDA & ORS. ....
The Delhi High Court held that among eligible candidates for promotion in the DDA, seniority prevails over date of eligibility unless rules explicitly provide otherwise, setting aside the CAT's contrary interpretation.