Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Vijay Kumar @ Babloo v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the convictions of three appellants for murder and robbery based on reliable circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, recoveries, and forensic proof, dismissing their appeals.
Gupta Bros. (India) v. GAIL India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with the consent of parties.
Gupta Bros. (India) v. Gail India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitration proceedings under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with the consent of both parties.
Manjit Kaur v. Guru Singh Sabha Khalsa
The Delhi High Court held that a teacher is not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, and thus termination of her service cannot be challenged under that Act.
M.C.D. v. Shanti Devi
The Delhi High Court held that disengagement of a casual daily wage worker without 240 days of service does not amount to retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act, setting aside the Labour Court's award of reinstatement and back wages.
Ahasaas Agarwal v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Avinash Kumar & Ors. v. State N.C.T of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Manish Aggarwal v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from it after the parties to a matrimonial dispute amicably settled and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Inderjeet Singh & Ors. v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 307, 308, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that further prosecution would serve no useful purpose.
Ravinder Kumar & Ors. v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
SICOM LTD v. HANUNG TOYS & TEXTILES LTD
The Delhi High Court held that transfer of winding up proceedings to the NCLT under Section 434(c) of the Companies Act is discretionary and not mandatory where an Official Liquidator has been appointed.
Satya Prakash & Bros (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Qutab Realcon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit under Order XXXVII CPC is maintainable only if reliefs are strictly within its ambit and against persons privy to the documents, dismissing claims against directors not personally liable.
Union of India v. G. L. Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards directing payment to G.L. Litmus Events Pvt. Ltd., holding that absence of formal certification by a committee was waived by the Organizing Committee’s conduct and acceptance of alternative certification forms.
Frankfinn Aviation Services (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Rahul Chauhan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that settlement agreements without executable decrees cannot prevent suit withdrawal and emphasized the need for enforceable terms in mediation settlements.
FLOW COOL INDIA PVT. LTD. v. FLOW TECH AIR PVT. LTD. & ORS.
The Delhi High Court rejected a commercial suit against company directors for recovery of money on vague verbal guarantee claims and impermissible reliefs, allowing the plaintiff to file afresh.
Jawahar T and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees recruited through the same advertisement must be granted uniform pension benefits, directing grant of Old Pension Scheme to petitioners denied the same.
AMR INDIA LTD v. NTPC LTD
The Delhi High Court granted a further nine-month extension for making the arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, recognizing the complexity and voluminous nature of the arbitration proceedings.
Hindustan Construction Company Limited v. NHPC Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the time for the Arbitral Tribunal to pass the award beyond the statutory and mutually extended period under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S KSS-KSSIIPL CONSORTIUM v. M/S GAIL INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for extended stay compensation, holding that quoting 'NIL' in the contract waived such claims and the Supreme Court's prior order operates as res judicata on the non-arbitrability and absence of dispute.
Jaipal Chand Jain v. Manoj Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's leave to defend applications in two loan recovery suits, holding that the Court has territorial jurisdiction and the defendant raised no substantial defense, thereby decreeing the suits in favor of the plaintiffs with interest.