Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Ishan Chopra v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's refusal to continue prosecution.
Colonel Ramesh Pal Singh v. Sughandhi Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court held that an order granting interim custody under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act is an interlocutory order and not appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, dismissing the appeal as not maintainable.
Dr. Rajani Sinha v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate completing DNB training within the scheduled cut-off date fixed by the affiliated institute is entitled to the degree despite an earlier prescribed cut-off date in the Information Bulletin, and directed the NBE to issue the degree.
Vivek Bindra v. Geetika Bindra
The Delhi High Court held that a plaintiff must specifically plead and prove that property held in the spouse's name was purchased from his known sources to claim exemption under the Benami Transactions Act, and without such pleading, a suit for sole ownership cannot be entertained.
Glaxo Smithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd & Anr v. Naval Kishore Goyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' use of the deceptively similar trademark FENTEL infringed the plaintiffs' registered trademark ZENTEL and constituted passing off, granting permanent injunction and damages in favor of the plaintiffs.
Nishant Basoya v. Registrar General Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court corrected erroneous answer keys in the Delhi Judicial Services Preliminary Exam, directed recomputation of results, and upheld key legal principles on plaint rejection, specific performance, compromise decrees, jurisdiction, and contracts of guarantee.
Dr. Alok Bhandari & Anr. v. Dewan Chand
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's appeal, setting aside the order granting leave to defend and decreeing eviction on the ground of bonafide necessity under the Delhi Rent Control Act, emphasizing the landlord's right to use property as per genuine need.
Dr. Alok Bhandari & Anr. v. Vishnu Dutt Tewari
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord’s appeal and ordered eviction of commercial tenants on the ground of bonafide necessity, holding that unsuitable residential flats do not defeat such eviction claims.
Alok Bhandari & Anr. v. Mukesh Chander
The Delhi High Court held that a landlord's bonafide necessity for commercial use of tenanted premises justifies eviction despite existence of alternative residential accommodations, setting aside leave to defend granted to tenants.
M/S Mahindra and Mahindra Limited v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing restoration of a cancelled tender and issuance of purchase order to the successful bidder who agreed to supply water tankers with corrected specifications at the original rate.
M/S D.A.V. SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL v. MS. GANGA DEVI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court's award of compensation for illegal termination under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, affirming limited scope of supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
MCD v. Mahesh Chand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the MCD's writ petition, upholding the Industrial Tribunal's award directing payment of wages to the employee for the disputed period, emphasizing limited scope of interference under Article 227.
DTC v. Dilpat Singh
The Delhi High Court held that rejection of approval under Section 33(2)(b) deems dismissal void but full backwages are not automatic and reduced the awarded backwages to 50% based on relevant circumstances.
Pushpender Singh Chawla v. Commissioner Employees Compensation Act and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that after liability for compensation is judicially determined, recovery must be pursued through execution proceedings under the Employees Compensation Act, and rejected the petitioner's fresh application under Sections 12 and 13 while clarifying that adverse observations would not prejudice such proceedings.
Suresh Kapoor v. Shashi Krishanlal Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment to the plaint specifying valuation based on circle rates for court fee purposes but upheld that court fees must ultimately be paid on the market value as directed in an earlier order, framing valuation as a trial issue.
Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Joint Venture of M/s Sai Rama Engineering Enterprises (SREE) & M/s Megha Engineering & Infrastructure Limited (MEIL)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award for being barred by strict limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that defective initial filings do not stop limitation and delay beyond 120 days cannot be condoned.
Lilu Ram Garg v. Pallavi Mehra
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of the petition challenging eviction on the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Irfan Ul Haq & Ors v. Mohd Ikram & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed leave to defend in an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act where ownership and bona fide necessity were disputed, setting aside the eviction order and directing expedited proceedings.
Mohd Shahid & Ors. v. Qureshia Begam
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, staying execution of the eviction order subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Tanveer Ahmed v. Qureshia Begam
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition challenging eviction under bonafide necessity, stayed execution of the eviction order subject to the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.