Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Inderjit

09 Oct 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:5094

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's order reinstating a workman with continuity of service and 50% backwages after the rejection of approval for his removal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2)(b) removal order departmental inquiry

The Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla

09 Oct 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5122-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's appeal, holding that without an inquiry, framing of charges does not bar withdrawal of resignation and reinstatement of a government servant.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant withdrawal of resignation government servant framing of charges inquiry

SMS Limited v. Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

09 Oct 2019 · G. S. Sistani; Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2019:DHC:5121-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the respondent's cancellation of a tender and refusal to award contract to the petitioner, holding that such administrative decisions are not subject to judicial interference unless arbitrary or mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant public tender cancellation of tender arbitrariness judicial review

M/S. SANTUR CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

09 Oct 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:5114-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to revive long-barred land acquisition claims under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that stale claims with inordinate delay and laches cannot be entertained.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition laches delay

M/S TAROUNI CONSTRUCTION&FINANCE (P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

09 Oct 2019 · VIPIN SANGHI; SANJEEV NARULA · 2019:DHC:5118-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings after over three decades, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims barred by delay and laches.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition delay and laches possession

M/S Samman Construction & Finance (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:5117-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings as barred by delay and laches, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims and the acquisition was validly completed.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition delay and laches possession

M/S. DHOOP CHAWN CONSTRUCTION &FINANCE (P) LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

09 Oct 2019 · VIPIN SANGHI; SANJEEV NARULA · 2019:DHC:5111-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging land acquisition proceedings after over three decades, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act cannot revive stale claims barred by delay and laches.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition delay and laches stale claims

M/S. SANTUR CONSTRUCTION & FINANCE (P) LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

09 Oct 2019 · Vipin Sanghi; Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:5116-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging decades-old land acquisition proceedings, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not revive stale claims barred by delay and laches, and a subsequent purchaser without valid title lacks locus standi.

property petition_dismissed Significant Section 24(2) of 2013 Act land acquisition delay and laches stale claims

Vidhanashi Kamalia & Anr. v. University of Delhi & Ors.

09 Oct 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5119-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's practice of shifting meritorious reserved category candidates to the unreserved category list in subsequent admission rounds, affirming that reservation provisions cannot disadvantage meritorious reserved candidates.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant reservation meritorious reserved candidate unreserved category admission process

Roshan Lal v. Delhi Jal Board

09 Oct 2019 · Hima Kohli; Asha Menon · 2019:DHC:5115-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone delay, upholding termination of service for prolonged unauthorized absence and affirming limited judicial interference in disciplinary matters.

labor appeal_dismissed disciplinary proceedings unauthorized absence termination of service judicial review

SHIVAAI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

09 Oct 2019 · Hima Kohli; Asha Menon · 2019:DHC:5112-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 427-day delay in re-filing a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation period Condonation of delay

Dal Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

04 Oct 2019 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7971-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court held that Inspectors who attained grade pay ₹ 4800/- via ACP are entitled to non-functional upgradation to ₹ 5400/- after four years, overruling restrictive executive circulars.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme grade pay non-functional upgradation Central Excise Inspectors

Rao Adal Singh College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

01 Oct 2019 · C. Harishankar · 2019 DHC 7476

The Delhi High Court upheld the National Council for Teacher Education's regulatory decisions, dismissing the petition challenging the withdrawal of recognition of the petitioner college.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant National Council for Teacher Education recognition educational institutions regulatory authority

Apex University v. National Council for Teacher Education

01 Oct 2019 · The Chief Justice; C. Harishankar J. · 2019:DHC:7472-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the NCTE's regulatory amendments and Public Notice restricting eligibility for new Integrated Teacher Education Programmes to universities and higher education institutions and affirmed the validity of prior State Government consultation in the application process.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 Recognition Norms and Procedure Regulations, 2014 2019 Amendment Regulations Integrated Teacher Education Programme

Vivek Sharma & Ors v. The State & Anr

01 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5072

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR and all proceedings following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Vikas Sharma & Anr. v. State & Anr.

01 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5071

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement matrimonial dispute

Uttam Singh v. State & Anr.

01 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5076

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement criminal proceedings discontinuation of prosecution

Nitesh Kumar & Ors. v. State & NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5075

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC criminal proceedings

Sher Ali @ Iran v. The State

01 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5074

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC mediation

Darshan Mohan Singh Nanda & Anr. v. State & Ors.

01 Oct 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5073

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and their consent to discontinue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC inherent powers