Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
The Commissioner of Income Tax - Exemption v. Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that foreign contributions received under a sovereign bilateral agreement do not attract FCRA provisions and the respondent society is exempt from income tax on such contributions.
Nanak Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners accused of violent protest-related offences, emphasizing bail as the rule and imposing conditions to safeguard investigation and public order.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Rinku Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an owner who verifies a driver's licence and tests driving skills is protected under the insurance policy despite a fake licence, and awarded compensation for loss of love and affection to claimants.
Man Mohan Pandey v. Bharat Electronics Limited
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary proceedings initiated by officers other than the designated disciplinary authorities under BEL's rules are illegal, quashed the charge sheets and suspension orders, and directed reinstatement of the petitioners.
Lalit alias Lucky v. State
The Delhi High Court modified a murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, sentencing the appellant to ten years imprisonment for a fatal single knife blow inflicted in a sudden fight.
Ritesh Properties & Industries Ltd v. YouTube LLC & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a defamation suit against YouTube and Google for non-disclosure of material facts and failure to plead falsity, emphasizing the duty of full disclosure when seeking ex parte injunctions in commercial disputes.
Axis Communications v. Wapcos Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of a government contract, holding that judicial interference in tender processes requires clear arbitrariness or mala fides, which was absent here.
Midas Netcom Limited v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for voluntary winding up and dissolution of Midas Netcom Limited under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 after finding full compliance with statutory requirements.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. KIRAN SHARMA
The Delhi High Court upheld CAT's order directing salary parity for contractual Protection Officers with Welfare Officers for the interregnum period pending Recruitment Rules notification, dismissing the Government's challenge.
Dilpreet Singh Gandhi v. Neeraj & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's appeal, setting aside the eviction order and granting leave to defend where triable issues on landlord's bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) were raised.
Sudesh Kumar Bansal v. Ajay Saini & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant leave to defend against eviction on bona fide necessity grounds, holding that triable issues regarding landlord's disclosure and artificial scarcity require trial.
Kailash Aggarwal & Associates v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is generally not appropriate for adjudicating disputed factual questions involving electricity connection cost estimates and directed the parties to resolve the dispute through civil proceedings.
Naveen Saroha v. Airline Allied Services Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to extend the time for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award beyond the statutory period under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on the basis of mutual consent and sufficient cause.
Usha Narang v. Mahesh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, staying execution of the eviction order on the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges.
Sushil Kumar v. Rama Mehta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's petition and upheld eviction on bona fide necessity grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, affirming the landlord's right to use the premises for personal use including a legal office.
Bijender Gupta v. Hardawari Lal
The Delhi High Court held that absolute ownership is not required for eviction under Sections 14(1)(a) and 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, and remitted the eviction petition for fresh consideration on merits.
M/S Gurunanak Fashion Studio Pvt. Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to sealing and demolition of residential premises used for commercial purposes must be addressed before the Monitoring Committee, dismissing the petition for interim relief and directing the petitioner to approach the Committee.
Zuber Khan & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties recorded before the Family Court.
Gaurav Arora & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Deepu Kumar v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's no objection to prosecution.