Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Rajat Kakkar & Ors. v. Krishan Gupta Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order allowing a landlord's bona fide requirement for possession, holding that the tenant failed to show suitable alternative accommodation or raise a prima facie defense.
CORRUPTION AGAINST SOCIETY v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking blanket demolition of religious structures on government land, directing authorities to act lawfully and follow due process on a case-by-case basis.
D R BHAGAT v. KRISHAN GOPAL SHARMA
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on the ground of bona fide requirement, holding that the landlord's need for suitable accommodation for his family was genuine and no triable issue was disclosed by the tenant.
Prem Kumar Aggarwal v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a director accused of massive corporate fraud but kept Non-Bailable Warrants in abeyance pending trial court proceedings, emphasizing strict scrutiny in economic offences.
Shri Shyam Lal Khatana v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of a tender to respondent No.3, holding that the bid was responsive and the award was neither arbitrary nor mala fide, thus not warranting judicial interference.
Bibi Bulo & Ors. v. Mohd Jahangir & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced the motor accident compensation by applying the correct multiplier, reducing personal expenses deduction, and granting individual loss of consortium and love and affection to each claimant.
Meja Urja Nigam Pvt. Ltd. v. Ratna Infrastructure Projects Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of time for completion of arbitral proceedings and regularized the period pending appointment of a substitute arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
V K Dhingra v. Shri Ram Scientific Industrial Research Foundation
The Delhi High Court held that exclusive possession of employer-allotted residential accommodation creates a leasehold interest, allowing eviction of an ex-employee unlawfully retaining the premises beyond employment tenure.
Raghubir Singh Arora & Anr v. Rajesh Khanna
The Delhi High Court held that market rent based on comparable leases must be fixed under Order XVA CPC during landlord-tenant litigation, rejecting a nominal rent claim under the Rent Control Act without credible evidence.
Maya Devi v. Mahesh Kumar and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to set aside a consent decree on property transfer, holding that Section 23 of the Senior Citizens Act does not apply to transfers before the Act and that the decree cannot be challenged without proof of fraud or coercion.
Khanna v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging a security agency tender as withdrawn after the tender was awarded and petitioners were rejected on technical grounds, leaving substantive legal questions open.
Om Prakash Jatav v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal challenging a pending show cause notice under the DUSIB Act, directing the authority to adjudicate the notice with a hearing opportunity and noting the statutory appeal remedy.
Chander Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Anr.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to furnish belated security and set aside the closure of evidence order to ensure adjudication on merits following a Supreme Court remand.
Ritesh v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 288 and 337 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rahil Kumar Jawa v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Harsh Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the injured party's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Chaman & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003 following an amicable settlement and no objection from the complainant.
Anil Bhargav v. The Vice Chairman, DDA & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of the PIL concerning Sheesh Mahal after noting adequate security and repair measures taken by the DDA, directing continued protection and budget allocation for the monument.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd v. Chhoti Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded a motor accident compensation case for reconsideration of dependency and deductions, enhancing non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Mohd. Ikram v. The Govt. of NCT Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL filed by a third party seeking protection of a mosque property, holding that the property owner capable of protecting its rights must pursue appropriate legal remedies.