Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SUNNY GARG & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal partly, remanding the matter for reappraisal of dependency and enhancing compensation for a mentally disabled claimant's loss of care and consortium under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SUNNY GARG & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals to enhance compensation for a mentally disabled claimant's loss of care and remanded the matter for reappraisal of dependency claims, affirming non-pecuniary damages under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Asianet Star Communications Pvt Ltd v. The Registrar of Trademarks & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a trademark cannot be deemed abandoned without valid issuance of the O-3 renewal notice and directed interim protection pending inquiry into alleged backdating of notices.
Krishna Devi & Ors v. Krishan Kumar Sharma & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the sale proclamation in a partition suit and directed all parties to be allowed to participate in the public auction of the indivisible property.
Ram Badan v. Angoori Devi
The High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act as withdrawn on the petitioner’s undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and pay use and occupation charges until then.
Murari Lal v. Sharda Devi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction on bona fide necessity grounds but stayed execution until the tenant vacates the premises by a specified date upon giving binding undertakings.
Chhuttan Lal Mattu Mal v. Muna Lal Ram Dayal (HUF)
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a revision petition against eviction under bona fide necessity after parties settled, staying eviction execution until the petitioner vacates as agreed.
M/S APCO-TITAN (JV) v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a sub-contractor without contractual privity cannot claim payment directly from the government entity under Section 70 Indian Contract Act, especially during insolvency moratorium against the main contractor.
M. K. Saini v. Indraprastha Power Gen Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed IPGCL to examine the petitioner’s factual claims and pass a reasoned order on salary entitlement for the period during which he did not render service following a quashed transfer order.
Deepika Veerwal v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Dar-Us-Slam judgment applies only to undergraduate courses and directed the NBE to consider the petitioner’s admission to the DNB (Post MBBS) course, rejecting the ground of seat blocking under the All India Quota.
Salahuddin v. Mahajan Tanners Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's application to dissolve Mahajan Tanners Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to absence of assets, ending the winding up process and discharging the Liquidator.
Meena Dabas v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR and charge sheet under Sections 448, 506, and 34 IPC, holding that prima facie evidence exists and the matter requires trial.
Yogender Prasad Aggarwal v. State
Anticipatory bail was denied where forensic evidence indicated forged ownership documents and the petitioner failed to cooperate fully with the investigation.
Tek Chand Aggarwal v. The State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of forgery and fabrication of property ownership documents due to the necessity of custodial interrogation and failure to cooperate with investigation.
Court on its own motion v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over property ownership and alleged unauthorized use cannot be adjudicated in a public interest writ petition and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Fortune Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. United Bank of India; Vintron Informatics Limited v. United Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that recipients of forged demand drafts prepared on stolen bank draft leaves are liable to repay the amounts to the bank, rejecting equitable defenses and upholding the bank's recovery rights under the RDDBFI Act.
Amit Sharma v. Anuj Kochaaar & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to enhance compensation for permanent spinal disability affecting loss of future earnings in a motor accident claim.
Ramesh Kumar Mali v. Assistant Engineer, DDA & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court’s rejection of ownership and injunction claims over land acquired by the DDA, holding that the suit was barred for non-joinder of the DDA and that acquisition and possession by the government prevail over unregistered private claims.
Atraj & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking demolition of unauthorized constructions on government land, holding that ownership and legality issues cannot be decided under Article 226 and directing respondents to act lawfully after due process.
R P Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking investigation into alleged illegal property registrations, directing completion of the ongoing vigilance inquiry against the respondent in accordance with law.