Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
D.T.C. v. AAS MOHAMMAD & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application for clarification of a clear order, holding that improper implementation by authorities does not warrant clarification but requires other legal remedies.
Tarsem Jain v. Bharat Forge Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond 120 days in filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act cannot be condoned, and defective initial filings do not stop limitation.
Dharampal Bhutani & Ors v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all related proceedings under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Stuti Malhotra v. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi High Court permitted continuation of stem cell therapy pending final regulatory clarity under the New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules, 2019, while keeping all substantive issues open for future adjudication.
Priya Goel & Ors. v. State of Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the legal heirs of Lt. Mr. Neel Goel for his estate after considering family settlement and procedural compliance.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. M/S National Building Construction India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to condone delay in filing the written statement beyond 120 days in a commercial suit, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.
Ramesh Chand & Ors. v. National Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying minimum wages, personal deduction, loss of future prospects, and awarded non-pecuniary damages to all children of the deceased.
C P SYSTEM PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX AUDIT-1 DELHI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging CESTAT's refusal to condone a 468-day delay in filing cross objections under Section 86(4) of the Finance Act, 1994, holding that financial difficulties and procedural delays do not justify such inordinate delay.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Shekhar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's leave to appeal against acquittal in a rape case due to inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and failure to prove minority and non-consent beyond reasonable doubt.
J.M.D. Global Private Limited v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-5 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reopening income tax assessment under Section 148 based on credible new material revealing transactions with a bogus entry provider, emphasizing the assessee's onus under Section 68 to prove genuineness.
GSK Consumer Healthcare S.A v. EG Pharmaceuticals & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendants from using the deceptively similar mark 'BIOTRIVIN' against plaintiff's registered trademark 'OTRIVIN', holding the defendant's registration valid but recognizing plaintiff's passing off claim.
Odeon Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. NBCC (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 45-day period for filing replication and affidavit under its Original Side Rules cannot be extended beyond the prescribed limit, dismissing the plaintiff's appeal against closure of such right.
Union of India v. Pradeep Mathur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of Autonomous Bodies are not entitled to pension benefits under CCS Pension Rules without Ministry of Finance concurrence, setting aside CAT orders mandating such benefits.
Raj Kumar Brothers v. Life Essentials Personal Care Private Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the agreed juridical seat of arbitration at Gurugram confers exclusive jurisdiction on Gurugram courts, and thus the Delhi High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
PURO WELLNESS PVT LTD v. TATA CHEMICALS LTD
Delhi High Court allowed appeal setting aside injunction against three TV commercials by Puro Wellness, holding they did not prima facie disparage Tata Salt, while upholding injunction against a viral video and modifying injunction on promotional materials.
Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Disaster Management Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider and provide relief and compensation to fire disaster victims under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 upon proper identification and entitlement.
Patnam Azeez v. Medical Council of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the MCI's denial of eligibility certificate based on biology subject requirements, directing reconsideration in light of a precedent holding such disqualification arbitrary and discriminatory.
Sh. Ram Charan Bansal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a PWD contract dispute, referring the matter to DIAC for arbitration.
Sh. Ram Charan Bansal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act and referred the parties to DIAC for arbitration of road maintenance contract disputes.
Prateek Singhal v. National Testing Agency
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's B.Arch admission seat for failing to meet the JEE Main 2019 eligibility criteria prescribed by the JEE Apex Board and JoSAA, affirming their authority to set higher standards than the Council of Architecture.