Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
Mudit Mohan Mittal v. Rajesh Mohan Mittal
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dividing partnership assets equally despite non-framing of additional issues, dismissing the petition challenging the award and referring the parties to mediation for property demarcation.
D.T.C. v. Jagdish
Dismissal of an employee without prior approval under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act is void, entitling reinstatement with back wages despite alleged misconduct or delay in raising dispute.
Sandeep v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder and related offences based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative forensic evidence, while acquitting him of rape due to lack of medical proof.
Mohd Faiz Khan v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(D), 506, and 509 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, subject to the petitioner paying Rs. 50,000 towards welfare.
Rakesh Kumar Kwatra & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
Rishabh Jaiswal & Anr v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354D, 120B, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Praveer Chandra v. Aprajita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that probate proceedings and partition suits are distinct and concurrent, and the pendency of probate does not warrant a stay of partition proceedings under Section 10 CPC.
Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. ACE Technologies Corp. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that defendants must deposit 10% of sales value as security for all infringing antenna sales during suit pendency, rejecting their claim that prior quantified guarantees suffice.
Mahinder Pal Singh v. Bhupinder Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition against eviction as withdrawn based on a mediation settlement with undertakings to vacate the premises and pay use and occupation charges, staying eviction execution until the agreed date.
Gulshan Arora v. Ramesh Chander
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for the landlord's dependent sons to start independent business.
Krishan Lal Gosain & Anr v. Mahender Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 as withdrawn on the petitioners' undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date.
Urmila Tanwar & Ors. v. D K Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that filing a list of witnesses under Order XVI Rule 1 CPC is mandatory and delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause, but allowed defendants to produce a handwriting expert witness subject to costs and strict conditions.
RECKITT BENCKISER (INDIA) P. LTD. v. SUREKHABEN L JAIN & ORS.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on a settlement where the defendants agreed to cease use of confusingly similar marks and trade dress and pay token damages.
Pappu Mal & Anr v. Anita Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction on the tenant's undertaking to vacate by a specified date and stay execution of the eviction order accordingly.
Om Prakash Puri v. Anita Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition as withdrawn and stayed the execution of the eviction order till 31.12.2020 on the tenant’s undertaking to vacate the premises and pay use and occupation charges.
Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax LTU, Delhi v. Nangalamal Sugar Complex
The Delhi High Court held that electricity generated and sold by a sugar mill is excisable goods, mandating reversal of Cenvat Credit under Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, and set aside the Tribunal's contrary order.
Om Prakash Puri v. Anita Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s petition as withdrawn after he undertook to vacate the premises by a specified date in an eviction dispute.
Naincy Sagar v. Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies and Anr.
Students detained for short attendance but having obtained at least 50% of total credits must be promoted to the next academic year under university ordinance provisions.