Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Nikunj Singhania v. Sehgal Sons

01 Nov 2019 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2019:DHC:5669

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord’s eviction petition on bonafide necessity grounds following a settlement with the tenant, setting aside the earlier dismissal and ordering eviction on agreed terms.

property appeal_allowed eviction bonafide necessity Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 landlord-tenant dispute

Sangita Devi & Ors. v. New India Assurance Ltd & Ors.

01 Nov 2019 · Najmi Waziri · 2019:DHC:5679

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation by applying minimum wages for a matriculate and granted additional amounts for loss of love and affection and consortium in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loss of dependency minimum wages matriculate motor accident claim

Parveen Kumar v. Dr. Udit Raj and Ors.

01 Nov 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5675-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the PIL challenging token distribution to street vendors, holding that the matter is under police investigation and any illegality must be addressed by authorities in accordance with law.

administrative petition_dismissed street vendors illegal encroachment token distribution Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending Act, 2014

Amit Sahni v. National Highway Authority of India

01 Nov 2019 · D.N. Patel; C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5677-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the National Highway Authority of India to ensure timely provision and maintenance of basic commuter facilities on specified expressways, recognizing practical constraints in immediate implementation.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation National Highway Authority of India basic amenities wayside facilities

Rajesh Grover & Ors. v. State & Anr.

01 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5672

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the married parties, holding that further prosecution would serve no useful purpose.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Prateek Construction v. Irrigation & Flood Control Department & Anr.

01 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2019:DHC:5664

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator after the respondents failed to respond to the arbitration notice, holding that they forfeited their right to appoint an arbitrator.

civil other arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator forfeiture of right condonation of delay

M/S Prateek Construction Government Contractor and Supplier v. Irrigation & Flood Control Department & Anr.

01 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5665

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator after the respondents failed to appoint one within a reasonable time following the petitioner's invocation of arbitration.

arbitration appeal_allowed arbitration agreement appointment of arbitrator forfeiture of right Section 12 Arbitration Act

DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LTD. v. ARCHANA SHARMA

01 Nov 2019 · J. R. Midha · 2019:DHC:5674

The Delhi High Court set aside the Industrial Tribunal’s interim relief order for lack of reasoned findings and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant interim relief Industrial Tribunal reasoned order recording of reasons

Simply Digital v. Ants & Ors.

01 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5673

The Delhi High Court granted a one-year extension for concluding arbitration proceedings beyond the statutory period under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, emphasizing expeditious completion and no unnecessary adjournments.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29(1) Section 29-A(4) extension of time

ITD Cementation India Limited v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited

01 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5667

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, balancing the parties' requests.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitral award

ERA INFRA ENGINEERING LIMITED v. NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED

01 Nov 2019 · Jyoti Singh · 2019:DHC:5666

The Delhi High Court appointed the same arbitrator presiding over pending arbitration to adjudicate new distinct disputes under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving overlap issues to the arbitrator.

arbitration petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration Act appointment of arbitrator overlapping disputes Section 12 disclosure

Ashok Malhotra v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr

01 Nov 2019 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2019:DHC:5659
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a victim does not have a statutory right under Section 372 CrPC to appeal against an inadequate sentence imposed on the accused, limiting victim appeals to acquittal, lesser offence conviction, or inadequate compensation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 372 CrPC victim's right to appeal inadequate sentence inadequate compensation

Dharmender & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

01 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5662

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses and the complainant's decision not to pursue prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement criminal proceedings complainant consent

Mushtak @ Palo v. State

01 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5661

The Delhi High Court maintained the conviction under Section 377 IPC but modified the sentence by releasing the petitioner on the period already undergone upon payment of compensation to the victim.

criminal sentence_modified Section 377 IPC unnatural sexual intercourse compensation under Section 357 CrPC sentence modification

Krishan Dutt & Ors. v. State & Anr.

01 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5660

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Mohd. Ajeem & Anr v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr

01 Nov 2019 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:5663

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's non-objection, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC inherent powers of High Court

Mera Baba Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Chailu Through LRs

01 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:5700

The Delhi High Court held that in absence of a forfeiture clause and counterclaim for damages, the seller's legal representatives must refund the earnest money with interest to the buyer under an agreement to sell.

civil appeal_allowed Significant agreement to sell earnest money forfeiture refund

Naseema v. Munavvar Ali & Ors.

01 Nov 2019 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2019:DHC:5670

The Delhi High Court dismissed a partition suit as not maintainable due to the pendency of an earlier suit for partition of the same properties involving the same parties, applying Section 10 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit Section 10 CPC res judicata maintainability

PROWIZ MANSYSTEMS PVT LTD v. ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

01 Nov 2019 · Rekha Palli · 2019:DHC:5671

The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of damages on an employer for wilful default in depositing provident fund dues deducted from employee incentives, affirming the statutory duty to timely deposit such contributions under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 14B wilful default mens rea

Ashok Hotel Mazdoor Janta Union v. Vijay Dutt

01 Nov 2019 · C. Hari Shankar · 2019:DHC:5688

The Delhi High Court clarified that wage payments directed by court orders must be calculated from the actual writ petition filing date, modifying earlier directions based on incorrect averments.

labor appeal_allowed contempt of court wages writ petition filing date differential wages