Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Mohd Abid v. Sahiba Kosar Qureshi
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging closure of cross-examination but granted one final opportunity subject to costs, emphasizing procedural compliance and justice.
Amit Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rehan Khan & Ors. v. State Through SHO & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Gaurav Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. State of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Dr. Kamal Rawal v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354(A)/354(B) IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Vishal Kalhan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC following an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Aditya Vikram Singh Sethi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Mohd. Raju @ Raju v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under POCSO Act based on credible testimony and DNA evidence but reduced the sentence to the period already served, granting release to the appellant.
UOI & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in its earlier order, reducing the time frame for completing a Review DPC exercise from twelve months to twelve weeks.
Anish Muralidhar and Capt Karolin Johnson v. COL Ajit Dhaka
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sub Maj Om Chand Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law only.
Himanshu Gupta and Ors. v. The State (State of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under non-compoundable offences based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
DPMI Vocational Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of course completion certificates to all students admitted under interim orders in deactivated vocational courses, holding that arbitrary denial violates Article 14 and that writ jurisdiction is maintainable despite arbitration clauses.
Vikash v. Delhi Medical Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Delhi Medical Council’s dismissal of a medical negligence complaint, ruling that the petitioner was given a fair hearing and that the disciplinary authority’s findings based on medical evidence did not warrant judicial interference.
PMI Electro Mobility Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Convergence Energy Services Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld cancellation of bids and invocation of EMDs against a bidder for material non-disclosure of an ongoing inquiry in a public procurement process under the FAME-II scheme.
Cembond Constructions Pvt Ltd v. National Thermal Power Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court set aside NTPC's banning circular extending APCPL's ban on the petitioner, holding that such extension without independent show cause notice and hearing violates natural justice and fundamental rights.
Poonam Narang v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection to a property owner to file and have her application for regularization of permissible construction considered by the MCD without coercive action during pendency.
Yusuf Baig v. Government of N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court remanded the dispute over demolition of an ancient Dargah on public land to the Religious Committee for reconsideration, emphasizing balancing public interest and religious sensitivities in unauthorized encroachment cases.
Tata Capital Limited v. Krishan Kumar Garg & Anr.
The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, and dismissed the petition challenging the closure of the right to file a written statement.
National Medical Commission v. Index Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR alone cannot justify withdrawal of medical college seat renewal and directed the National Medical Commission to decide admissions based on expert inspection and statutory compliance, aligning with Supreme Court precedent.