Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

R.N. Singh v. Murari Mirchandani and Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7789-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected in part under Order VII Rule 11 CPC and that the plaint discloses a cause of action against the appellant, dismissing the appeal against rejection of the plaint.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action rejection of plaint specific performance

Jazib Jafri v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7808

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354D IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 354D IPC Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

M/S GHT LOGISTICS v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7827

The Delhi High Court ordered the release of a refrigerated vehicle seized by MCD after the petitioner obtained a No Objection Certificate, emphasizing adherence to due process and Supreme Court directives against coercive action based on vehicle age.

administrative petition_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate Vehicle seizure Municipal Corporation of Delhi End of Life Vehicles

Bijender Singh v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited & Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7828

The Delhi High Court directed restoration of electricity connection subject to payment of dues and compliance with conditions, without adjudicating ownership disputes in a matrimonial dispute context.

administrative petition_allowed electricity connection restoration utility dues ownership dispute

Aman Kapasiya v. University of Delhi & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7786

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a student's election candidature as infructuous since the Union's tenure had expired and fresh elections were notified, leaving the eligibility issue undecided.

administrative petition_dismissed Delhi University Students' Union Elections candidature eligibility academic arrears writ petition

Sachin Bhati v. University of Delhi

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7782

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking recounting of votes in a student union election as infructuous since the union's tenure had expired and fresh elections were scheduled.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Students’ Union election vote counting recounting of votes election petition

Rohtash Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7780

The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal enhancing damages against licensing authorities for negligence in delaying issuance of a duplicate Driving License, entitling the employee to compensation for loss of salary.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Driving License Negligence Damages Public Service Vehicle badge

Daksh Bhardwaj v. University of Delhi

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7779

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Kirori Mal College Students’ Union election results as infructuous due to expiry of tenure and held that reliefs not pleaded cannot be granted.

constitutional petition_dismissed Students’ Union Election Code of Conduct violation Election petition infructuous Tenure expiry

Woodland (Aero Club) Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 49(1), New Delhi

08 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:7788-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the disallowance of deduction for employees’ contributions to PF/ESI deposited after the statutory due date under Section 36(1)(va), affirming the applicability of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Checkmate Services (P) Ltd. and the validity of adjustments under Section 143(1)(a).

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 143(1)(a) Section 36(1)(va) Section 43B

Sunil Kumar v. Girdhari Lal Sharma

08 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7802

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order dismissing the defendant's belated Written Statement and closing cross-examination due to non-payment of costs and non-appearance, rejecting attempts to delay the tenancy suit.

civil petition_dismissed Written Statement condonation of delay payment of costs cross-examination

Mohd Abid v. Sahiba Kosar Qureshi

08 Sep 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:7821

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging closure of cross-examination but granted one final opportunity subject to costs, emphasizing procedural compliance and justice.

civil appeal_dismissed cross-examination adjournment vakalatnama costs

Amit Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7812

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Rehan Khan & Ors. v. State Through SHO & Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7813

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties in a matrimonial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 482 CrPC Amicable settlement Quashing of FIR

Gaurav Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. State of NCT & Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7804

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Dr. Kamal Rawal v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7799

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354(A)/354(B) IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Vishal Kalhan v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7798

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279/337 IPC following an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Aditya Vikram Singh Sethi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

08 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:7817

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement non-compoundable offence

Mohd. Raju @ Raju v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7810

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under POCSO Act based on credible testimony and DNA evidence but reduced the sentence to the period already served, granting release to the appellant.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO presumption of guilt sexual assault

UOI & Ors. v. Vijay Kumar & Ors.

04 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7347-DB

The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in its earlier order, reducing the time frame for completing a Review DPC exercise from twelve months to twelve weeks.

administrative other typographical error correction of court order Review Departmental Promotion Committee time frame

Anish Muralidhar and Capt Karolin Johnson v. COL Ajit Dhaka

04 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7745-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting its review to errors of law under certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension primary hypertension armed forces tribunal certiorari jurisdiction