Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
SU KAM POWER SYSTEMS LIMITED v. OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that a company sold as a going concern under the IBC cannot be held liable for offences committed prior to the sale, and prosecution lies only against the officers in default at the relevant time.
Gandhi Kusth Krishi Sanstha v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that disputed revenue records do not confer ownership rights over government land, and the petitioner failed to establish any legal title or possession.
R V Sinha v. Ashwani Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging unauthorized construction on grounds that the petitioner lacked locus standi as no fundamental or legal right was affected, reaffirming that neighbors have no automatic legal right against illegal construction absent infringement of easementary rights.
Government of NCT of Delhi v. Neha Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order condoning delay without reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of limitation and delay before adjudicating the respondent's claim for Child Care Leave regularization.
N.K. Singh v. Gaurav Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing adherence to 10% EWS reservation by creating supernumerary posts, dismissing the petition challenging correction of reservation shortfall in recruitment.
Union of India & Ors. v. Sh Harish Chander Raheja
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition upholding the Tribunal's order restoring pay fixation and refunding gratuity deductions, relying on binding precedent affirmed by the Supreme Court.
COACH COM Through Its Sole Proprietor Smt. Lalita Devi Sureka v. SR. DME, Northern Railway
The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitral conciliation and DAB reference are directory, not mandatory, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Railway contract.
Colonel Sujata Sirohi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a disability arising during military service is presumed attributable to service unless the Medical Board provides cogent reasons otherwise, entitling the petitioner to disability pension.
NEXT GEN PHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. CD PHARMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the 120-day limitation period for filing a written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC excludes only the date of service of summons, and a written statement filed even one day late cannot be taken on record.
Jamotri Devi & Anr. v. Government of Chhattisgarh
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Clause 6(a) of the 2013 Instructions barring compassionate appointment if any family member is already in government service and dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of such appointment.
Hari Vadan Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court granted unconditional leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that the defendant raised substantial triable issues regarding payment and contractual obligations, requiring a full trial.
D K Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed recalculation of interest on retiral benefits by compounding annually as per GPF Rules and held interest on delayed gratuity payable only beyond three months from retirement under CCS (Pension) Rules.
M/S Azure Hospitality Private Limited v. Amit Bhasin
Delhi High Court allowed appeals setting interim terms permitting limited use of franchise trade names post-termination pending arbitration, balancing parties' rights and preventing public confusion.
Ajay v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court held that a candidate is not entitled to a fresh medical examination merely on the basis of favorable external medical opinions when two medical boards have concurrently found him medically unfit.
Major Anish Muralidhar and Caption Carolin Johnson v. Ex Sub Uday Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
Union of India and Ors. v. GP Capt S Kumaran (Retd)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
Mamtaz Foundation v. Dental Council of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Dental Council Regulations requiring State Government No Objection Certificates for establishing new dental colleges, dismissing the petition challenging these mandatory statutory requirements.
Barunkumar Ramlakhan Rana v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 10 Zone 2
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court's determination.
Anju v. Rampal
The Delhi High Court held that delay in furnishing security as a condition for leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC can be condoned under Sections 148 and 151 CPC where sufficient cause exists, including pendency of higher court proceedings.
Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as it had become infructuous and disposed of the petition accordingly.