Amit Singh & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 08 Sep 2025 · 2025:DHC:7812
Ravinder Dudeja
W.P.(CRL)2847/2025
2025:DHC:7812
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(CRL)2847/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 08.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, W.P.(CRL)2847/2025 & CRL.M.A. 26717/2025 EXEMPTION
AMIT SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Simran, Adv. along
WITH
P-1 to 5 in person.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel
WITH
Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar
Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs. & SI Sarita.
Mr. Kunal Ahlawat, Mr. Sudhir, Advs. along
WITH
R-2 in person.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 70/2021, dated 18.02.2021, registered at P.S Baba Haridas Nagar, Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. The factual matrix giving rise to the instant case is that the marriage between Petitioner No. 1 and Respondent no. 2/complainant was solemnized on 08.02.2019 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. No child was born out of the said wedlock. However, on account of temperamental differences Petitioner No. 1and Respondent No. 2 are living separately since 17.05.2019.

3. As per averments made in the FIR, Respondent No. 2 was subjected to physical and mental harassment on account of dowry demands by the petitioners. FIR no. 70/2021 was lodged at instance of respondent no. 2 under sections 498A/406/34 IPC against the petitioners. It is submitted that chargesheet has since been filed under sections 498A/406/34 IPC.

4. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi and the terms of the compromise were reduced into writing in the form of a Settlement dated 24.08.2024. It is submitted that petitioner no. 2 has paid Rs. 4,50,000/- (Rupees Four Lacs Fifty Thousand only) as full and final settlement as per the schedule mentioned in the settlement. Copy of the Settlement dated 24.08.2024 has been annexed as Annexure P-4.

5. Parties are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Sarita from PS Baba Haridas Nagar.

6. Respondent No. 2 confirms that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and she has received the total settlement amount and has no objection if the FIR No. 70/2021 is quashed against the Petitioners.

7. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 70/2021 is quashed.

8. Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicablesettlement of disputes in Rangappa Javoor vs The State Of Karnataka And Another, Diary No. 33313/2019, 2023 LiveLaw (SC) 74, Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs Babita Raghuvanshi & Anr., (2013) 4 SCC 58 & in Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC

303.

9. Further, it is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non-compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC.

10. In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice, to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

11. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and the FIR NO. 70/2021, dated 18.02.2021, registered at P.S Baba Haridas Nagar, Delhi under section 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

12. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

13. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.