Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Hari Vadan Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar Gupta

08 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:7947
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted unconditional leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that the defendant raised substantial triable issues regarding payment and contractual obligations, requiring a full trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit Memorandum of Understanding

D K Gupta v. Union of India

08 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7875-DB

The Delhi High Court directed recalculation of interest on retiral benefits by compounding annually as per GPF Rules and held interest on delayed gratuity payable only beyond three months from retirement under CCS (Pension) Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant General Provident Fund Rules, 1960 CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 interest calculation retiral benefits

M/S Azure Hospitality Private Limited v. Amit Bhasin

08 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7855-DB

Delhi High Court allowed appeals setting interim terms permitting limited use of franchise trade names post-termination pending arbitration, balancing parties' rights and preventing public confusion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant franchise agreement arbitration interim injunction trade name

Ajay v. Indian Coast Guard

08 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7910-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate is not entitled to a fresh medical examination merely on the basis of favorable external medical opinions when two medical boards have concurrently found him medically unfit.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical disqualification concurrent medical board opinion fresh medical examination ingrown toenail

Major Anish Muralidhar and Caption Carolin Johnson v. Ex Sub Uday Singh

08 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7844-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Union of India and Ors. v. GP Capt S Kumaran (Retd)

08 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Mamtaz Foundation v. Dental Council of India & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:7830-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Dental Council Regulations requiring State Government No Objection Certificates for establishing new dental colleges, dismissing the petition challenging these mandatory statutory requirements.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Dentists Act, 1948 Dental Council of India Regulations, 2006 Essentiality Certificate No Objection Certificate

Barunkumar Ramlakhan Rana v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 10 Zone 2

08 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7835-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court's determination.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Natural Justice

Anju v. Rampal

08 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:7892

The Delhi High Court held that delay in furnishing security as a condition for leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC can be condoned under Sections 148 and 151 CPC where sufficient cause exists, including pendency of higher court proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC condonation of delay security deposit leave to defend

Naveen Vedi v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7854-DB

The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as it had become infructuous and disposed of the petition accordingly.

other other writ petition withdrawal infructuous petition High Court of Delhi

Avantha Holdings Limited & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:7822

The court held that while forensic audit reports are expert opinions not attracting natural justice, promoters and directors must be given a hearing before their accounts are declared fraud under RBI directions, quashing SBI's fraud declaration against CG Power for failure to do so.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant forensic audit report principles of natural justice declaration of fraud RBI Master Directions on Frauds

Amit Chakraborty v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7885

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking interim stay on demolition and sealing orders by MCD, holding that lawful municipal actions following due process cannot be stayed despite pending appeals and administrative delays.

administrative petition_dismissed Demolition Order Sealing Order Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Completion-cum-Occupancy Certificate

Uma Shokeen v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

08 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:7884

The Delhi High Court allowed regularization applications for long-standing unauthorized constructions and restrained coercive action during their pendency, directing the MCD to act expeditiously in accordance with law.

administrative petition_allowed unauthorized construction regularization Delhi Development Authority Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Bhawna Arora v. Union of India

08 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7851-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioner to continue residing in Delhi temporarily and directed the respondents to pass a reasoned order treating the writ petition as a representation within four weeks.

constitutional appeal_dismissed writ petition continuance in Delhi reasoned order representation

Pratima Behera v. Union of India and Ors

08 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:7853-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondents undertook to decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks, binding them to this commitment.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition representation legal notice direction to decide

M/S. SMART WORLD COMMUNICATIONS v. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX AND CGST DELHI NORTH

08 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7840-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively unless the Show Cause Notice proposes it and objective reasons justify such cancellation, setting aside retrospective cancellation and directing cancellation effective from the SCN date.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Show Cause Notice principles of natural justice

Shivi Kansal v. Union of India

08 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:7838-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration for non-compliance with natural justice and directed a fresh hearing after the petitioner files a reply to the Show Cause Notice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation Show Cause Notice natural justice retrospective cancellation

Rajender Mishra v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:7857-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the police to conduct an effective investigation and submit monthly reports to trace the petitioner's missing minor son under its writ jurisdiction.

criminal petition_allowed missing minor Article 226 police investigation polygraph test

State NCT of Delhi v. Krishna Pandey

08 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:7845

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the impact of contradictions and lack of medical evidence on reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal sexual assault Section 376 IPC double presumption of innocence

Mata Amritanandamayi Math & Anr. v. Anil Kumar Jain & Ors.

08 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:7791-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an interim mandatory injunction against appellants in a land dispute, holding that insufficient prima facie evidence of encroachment and possession was shown, and directed trial on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ad interim mandatory injunction encroachment easementary rights sale deed