Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Ravinder Kumar Aggarwal v. Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Land Acquisition Collector to dispose of the petition under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act within a specified timeframe to ensure timely justice.
Yogya Chawla v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings arising therefrom based on an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
S K Jain v. ACIT, Circle 49 (1)
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authority to decide pending rectification applications within the statutory time limit by passing a reasoned order after hearing the petitioner.
DELHIVERY PRIVATE LIMITED v. TREASURE VASE VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff's mark 'DELHIVERY' is descriptive and generic, and the defendant's use of 'DELIVER-E' does not constitute deceptive similarity warranting injunction, while also ruling that valid service by speed post sufficed for interim relief.
Karan Goel v. Kanika Goel
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's dismissal of the husband's application to reject the wife's divorce petition, holding that Indian courts have jurisdiction when the wife is domiciled in India despite the husband's foreign domicile and foreign divorce decree.
Shiromani Akali Dal Delhi v. Directorate of Gurdwara Elections
The Delhi High Court permitted elections to the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee to proceed based on revised electoral rolls due to pandemic-related delays, directing fresh rolls to be prepared before the next elections.
Karan Sharma & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 0115/2020 and all proceedings arising therefrom based on the parties' amicable settlement and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Satnarain Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions for fiber optic installation in court complexes, directing the petitioner to first approach authorities with a representation for administrative consideration.
Nitin Gupta v. Genesis Infratech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of two arbitration petitions by recording a settlement agreement reached through court-sponsored mediation, binding the parties to its terms.
TATA PROJECTS LIMITED v. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that upon a party's default in appointing an arbitrator, the court may appoint the arbitrator suggested by that party if suitable, and accordingly appointed Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Singhvi as arbitrator on behalf of the respondent.
Shovan Patra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL filed by an employee challenging EPFO software and administrative decisions, holding that internal administrative disputes without mala fide are not suitable for judicial intervention.
Modak Dyeing and Printing Company Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner of Customs Disposal ICD Tughlakabad & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to pay outstanding charges with liberty to seek waiver, and authorized auction of containers upon breach of undertaking.
P. M. Diesels Pvt. Ltd. v. Thukral Mechanical Works and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld IPAB's refusal to implead the original trademark registrant in a rectification petition after a long delay, affirming that non-use claims must be considered against the bona fide assignee unless trafficking is alleged.
Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Xiaomi Corporation & Ors.
Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining enforcement of a foreign anti-suit injunction order that barred prosecution of Indian patent infringement proceedings, affirming jurisdiction to protect access to justice despite foreign court orders.
Nitin Gupta v. Genesis Infratech Private Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of arbitration petitions after the parties amicably settled their disputes through a court-facilitated Settlement Agreement, which was recorded and made binding.
Anil Goyal v. Prakash Plastic Industries & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a 12-month extension for concluding arbitral proceedings under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing the arbitrator to avoid unnecessary delays.
Usha Wadhwa v. Pushpa Sharma
The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to initiate arbitral proceedings and seek interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Union Bank of India v. Rajinder Kumar Singhal
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellate order confirming gratuity payment to a dismissed employee and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of gratuity forfeiture on merits with proper reasoning.
Ashutosh Razdan v. Netcom Softech Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's unreasoned order denying commercial dispute status and remanded the matter for fresh consideration under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
New Delhi Municipal Council v. Hari Ram Tiwari
The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement of a government servant for participating in electioneering, holding that the departmental inquiry was fair and in accordance with natural justice, and set aside the Labour Court's contrary orders.