Delhi High Court
99,566 judgments
Const. Satendra Kumar and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that transfers on working couple grounds in Railway Protection Force must be based on the spouse's permanent posting, not temporary deployment, and upheld cancellation of transfers made otherwise.
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of a government servant to a non-sensitive post outside Delhi during an ongoing vigilance inquiry, ruling that such transfers are lawful administrative actions not subject to judicial interference absent mala fide or illegality.
Lokeshh Goyal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 228 and 304A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement and adequate compensation paid to the complainant, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Shri Mobeen Khan v. Shri Obaid Khan
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as possession of the disputed property was handed over in compliance with Court directions, with the respondent undertaking to pay pending utility dues.
M/S MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LTD v. TELECOMMUNICATION CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking stay on encashment of a bank guarantee after respondents agreed to release the amount with interest.
Rajiv Saxena v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the indefinite suspension of Rajiv Saxena's passport under Section 10A of the Passports Act for failure to record reasons and grant hearing, affirming procedural safeguards and the fundamental right to travel.
Mohit Saraf v. Rajiv K Luthra
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restraining the respondent from unilaterally terminating the petitioner’s partnership and interfering with firm management, emphasizing adherence to the partnership deed and preserving status quo pending arbitration.
P Augustine and Anr v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court granted liberty to appellants to file a review petition for impleading the Registrar of Companies, disposing of the appeals filed against dismissal of writ petitions on procedural grounds.
Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to expeditiously issue mandatory notifications and regulations under the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, treating the writ petition as a representation and disposing it accordingly.
HILD Energy Private Limited v. Energy Efficiency Services Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of a bank guarantee after its expiry date is invalid, discharged the bank from liability, and directed the return of the bank guarantee to the petitioner.
City X Ray and Scan Clinic Pvt Ltd. v. The Medical Superintendent Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, after the respondent failed to appoint one, affirming the Court's jurisdiction to ensure impartial arbitration.
Surjeet Singh v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a delayed demand for enhanced land allotment charges and an Amnesty Scheme, holding the claim barred by delay and laches.
Riddhima Singh v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Single Judge’s order directing the petitioner to appear for the Class VIII examination within four weeks, holding that investigation into judicial orders is impermissible and compensation claims must be pursued in the writ petition.
Eleganz Interiors Private Limited v. Premium Port Lounge Management Company Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a terminated work order, converting pending interim relief applications into arbitration proceedings.
Yash Kumar & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered under Sections 323/341/506/509/34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's consent to discontinue prosecution.
Mahendra Singh & Ors. v. Energy Efficiency Services Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a recruitment advertisement by EESL on grounds of delay and laches, allowing the recruitment process to proceed.
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties, directing payment of compensation to the complainant and injured party.
Ravinder Singh Kohli v. The State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings based on an amicable settlement between the parties, subject to compliance with settlement terms.
Rajan Kathuria v. Naveen Kumar Sahni
Petition for possession dispute dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to claim user and occupation charges independently.
Shaheed Memorial Society v. Promila Kishore & Ors.
The court held that a suit alleging fraud in share transfer deeds is not barred by limitation if the fraud was discovered later, and such issues require trial rather than rejection of the plaint at the threshold.