Delhi High Court

99,566 judgments

Year:

M/S Nissan Motor India Private Limited v. M/S Fervent Communications Private Limited & Anr.

10 Dec 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:3548

The High Court upheld the trial court's order rejecting deletion of the petitioner as a party in a recovery suit, holding that disputed factual issues regarding privity and payment must be decided at trial.

civil petition_dismissed Order 1 Rule 10 CPC necessary party privity of contract deletion of party

Sanjeev Srivastava and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

10 Dec 2020 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2020:DHC:3551

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR for cheating following an amicable settlement between parties, imposing a welfare fund contribution as a condition.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement cheating offence

Banke Ram v. Govt. of India & Anr.

10 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3553-DB

The Delhi High Court held that directing collection of voice samples in departmental enquiry does not violate Article 20(3) protection against self-incrimination and dismissed the petition challenging such direction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 20(3) Constitution of India self-incrimination departmental enquiry voice sample

Raghubir Kaur v. Suresh Kumar

10 Dec 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:3550

The Delhi High Court held that no express liberty is required to file a revision petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act after withdrawing an appeal filed before a wrong forum against an eviction order.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction petition Section 14(1)(e) Section 25B

OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED v. INDERJEET KAUR KOHLI

10 Dec 2020 · SANJEEV SACHDEVA · 2020:DHC:3549

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition by recording the parties' mediated settlement and directing the proceedings to be closed accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Order 38 Rule 5 CPC security deposit mediation settlement agreement

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-9 v. Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd.

10 Dec 2020 · Manmohan; Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:3552-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the ITAT order and remanded the transfer pricing matter relating to AMP expenses to the TPO for fresh determination in line with the Division Bench ruling that rejected the Bright Line Test for establishing international transactions.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Transfer Pricing Advertising Marketing and Promotion (AMP) expenses Bright Line Test (BLT) International Transaction

Ravinder Yadav v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3543-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a public interest litigation on water logging in Najafgarh, holding that the respondents have taken adequate remedial measures and compliance with court orders, thus no further monitoring is required.

administrative petition_dismissed public interest litigation water logging drainage system Najafgarh

Sita Ram v. Sanam Aggarwal

09 Dec 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:3536

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking to reopen an eviction order after the petitioner had unconditionally withdrawn the petition and failed to vacate the premises within the stipulated time.

property petition_dismissed eviction Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) bona fide necessity

Anti Corruption Council of India Trust v. The Directorate of Education & Anr.

09 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3546-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest litigation petition for lack of specific evidence and vague allegations regarding online classes and fee overcharging by private schools.

constitutional petition_dismissed public interest litigation online classes fee overcharging vague allegations

Vipin v. University of Delhi

09 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3542-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a student to appear in a postponed examination after the University failed to notify him of the preponed date, ensuring fairness and natural justice.

education appeal_allowed Significant examination date preponement natural justice university examination student rights

Jeet Singh Chauhan v. Land Acquisition Collector, South East District

09 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3539-DB W.P.(C) No.945/2020

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus to forward a stale Section 18 reference application under the Land Acquisition Act, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedy under Section 28A instead.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18 Section 28A reference to Reference Court

India Tourism Development Corporation v. M/S. C.P. & Associates Pvt. Ltd.

09 Dec 2020 · Sanjeev Narula · 2020:DHC:3541

The Delhi High Court dismissed ITDC's review petitions challenging arbitral awards, holding that grounds not pressed during original proceedings cannot be raised in review under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Review petition Error apparent on face of record

Residents Welfare Association v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3547-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking demolition of alleged encroachments on public land for lack of joinder of necessary parties and failure to follow procedural safeguards.

administrative petition_dismissed public interest litigation unauthorized construction encroachment demolition

Chintpurni Medical College and Hospital and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.

09 Dec 2020 · JAYANT NATH · 2020:DHC:3535

The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Council of India's refusal to permit a medical college to admit students without fulfilling conditions of conditional recognition and undergoing fresh inspection and renewal under the Indian Medical Council Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 Section 10A Section 11(2) Section 19

All India Radio Casual Announcer and Comperes Union v. Union of India

09 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3544-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking resumption of AIR services and compensation to contractual workers by directing the authorities to treat the petition as a representation and decide it expeditiously in accordance with law.

administrative petition_dismissed All India Radio COVID-19 pandemic closure of services contractual workers

Nirmal Devi & Anr. v. Rakesh Kumar Jain & Ors.

09 Dec 2020 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2020:DHC:3537
Cites 0 · Cited by 14

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of applications for additional evidence at the appellate stage, holding that the petitioners failed to show due diligence for non-production of documents during trial as required under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) CPC additional evidence appellate court due diligence

Amanpreet Singh Kohli v. Pankaj Dayal

09 Dec 2020 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw; Asha Menon · 2020:DHC:3540-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interim orders affecting a non-party company cannot be granted in suits against its directors without impleading the company, dismissing the appeal against vacation of such an order.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC interim injunction non-party application separate legal entity

Dr. Suresh Chandra Gupta v. NCT of Delhi

09 Dec 2020 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2020:DHC:3538

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a surgeon accused of medical negligence causing death, relying on disciplinary findings and prima facie evidence of unqualified conduct.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail medical negligence Section 304 IPC Section 315 IPC

Naresh Nagar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Dec 2020 · D. N. Patel; Prateek Jalan · 2020:DHC:3545-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking directions to restore water supply and stop illegal factories by directing authorities to consider the petitioner’s representations in accordance with law.

constitutional petition_dismissed public interest litigation writ of mandamus COVID-19 water supply

Ant Ram & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Dec 2020 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2020:DHC:3509

The Delhi High Court directed the hospital to reinstate terminated contractual employees on prior terms during the pandemic, emphasizing preference for experienced workers and employer responsibility.

labor petition_allowed Significant contractual employees termination re-employment pandemic